Skip to main content

Full text of "MULLINS (Eustace) - The Biological Jew (1967) incl. biblio.pdf"

See other formats






At the age of forty-five, Eustace Mullins has completed 
thirty years of continuous activity as a writer, an artist and a 
businessman. With five books currently in print on fine arts, 
religious and economic subjects, he also carries on a fulltime 
business career, and is known as an artist's artist, a serious 
painter who has restored distance to the art of landscape, and 
whose paintings have won many prizes. He has also won prizes 
for his exhibitions of photographs, both portraits and still lifes. 

In business, he has been active as an economist, and in 
public relations. 

Eustace Mullins is a veteran of the United States Air Force, 
with thirty-eight months of active service during World War 
II. A native Virginian, he was educated at Washington and 
Lee University, New York University, the Escuela des Bellas 
Artes, Mexico, and the Institute of Contemporary Arts, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 

He served as legislative researcher during the late Senator 
Joseph McCarthy's battle against Communism, and has been 
a member of the staff of the Library of Congress. He has been 
a consultant on highway taxation for the American Petroleum 
Institute, an editor of Institutions Magazine, and an editorial 
director of the Chicago Motor Club. For fifteen years, he de- 
voted his services as editor and writer to the better-known con- 
servative publications in the United States. For a number of 
years, he was active in attempts to free the poet Ezra Pound 
from an illegal confinement in St. Elizabeth's Hospital, in 
Washington, D.C. 

He was the first writer to have a book burned in Germany 
after World War II, when a German edition of ten thousand 
copies of Mullins on the Federal Reserve was burned by Dr. 
Otto John, West Germany's Intelligence Director, a few days 
before he defected to Communist East Germany. 







The International Institute of Jewish Studies 

126 Madison Place 

Staunton, Virginia 24401 


Books by Eustace Mullins 






Library of Congress Card Catalog Number 68-54252 





"For ye are dead, and your life is hid with 
Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, 
shall appear, then shall ye also appear with 
Him in glory. " 






.2 3 


.3 8 


For twenty-five years, I have studied the problems of human 
failure, of falling short of the promise, and of the decay and 
collapse of great empires. This phenomenon has existed 
throughout the five thousand years that man has been record- 
ing the history of his efforts. During the first twenty years 
that I devoted to this study, I amassed huge files of information 
about the various civilizations. I compared these facts in order 
to find common denominators which might lead to a solution. 
I also took into consideration such factors as man's environ- 
ment, his nature, and the persistence of certain patterns in 
his behaviour. 

This led me to an involved study of the animal kingdom, 
and a compilation of those factors which it bore in common 
with the plant kingdom. About five years ago, I discovered 
the common denominator of man's civilizations. I had come 
to it directly through my studies in biology, for this common 
denominator is found throughout the plant and the animal 
kingdoms. Because it was a natural phenomenon, and such a 
ubiquitous one, an ordinary and accepted part of all levels 
of plant and animal life, no scholar had previously thought 
to examine this factor as a prime cause of the degeneration and 
fall of empires. 

This factor was parasitism. In the great advances which 
medicine had made during the past century, one of its most im- 
pressive achievements had been the rapidly developing field 
of parasitology. It had been found that many of man's most ser- 
ious ailments were caused by parasites. From these studies, 
it was only a matter of time before scholars would be able to 
deduce that a similar condition might occur among man's civi- 
lizations, and that it might also cause sickness and death. It 
was to be expected that in their autopsies of buried empires, 
scholars should conclude that this condition, parasitism, was 
a definitive factor in the fatal diseases which befell human 

But no scholar advanced this conclusion. In the entire Lib- 
rary of Congress, no work can be found which deals with the 
social effects of parasitism on civilization. There are hundreds 
of works about the medical aspects of parasitism, but none 

about its equally serious socio-economic effects. Why is this? 
Why have not the thousands of scholars in this field, casting 
desperately for the slightest limb on which to build the flimsy 
thought which will serve as their doctoral thesis, been unable 
to see what is in front of them, the destructive effects of 
parasitic groups on civilization? 

Let us offer the simplest explanation, since that is the usually 
correct one. The parasitic group in the civilization has fixed 
its domination over the academic and scholarly world. It would 
not tolerate any academic study which threatened its con- 
tinued domination. Is this a far-fetched conclusion? Then let 
us search for a better one, and after we have been unable to 
find one, let us examine several accepted factors. First, we 
know that parasitism exists in mankind. Second, the parasitic 
group is a compact, well-directed (and inner-directed) species. 
Third, the parasitic group, in order to maintain its parasitic 
position, must exercise some sort of control over its host, be- 
cause no host willingly tolerates the presence of the parasite. 
One obvious form of control would be a control over what the 
host thinks about, reads, and sees as entertainment, education 
and news. 

The studies of parasitism have progressed at a fantastic rate 
during the twentieth century, and I can take no special credit 
for having formulated the social theory of the parasitic group 
in human civilization, because this theory has been staring us 
in the face for at least two generations past. Nevertheless, so 
obscured has been this phenomenon that it took me five years 
to develop this theory, and I am aware that even now, I am 
only opening the door for a host of scholars who can employ 
this theory to shed much greater light upon human problems 
than I have been able to do in this comparatively brief time. 

Insofar as it has been possible, I have attempted to make 
this work as non-technical as possible, as much as the nature 
of the theory allowed, so that scholars in many other fields 
could employ it in their own work. The ramifications of this 
theory indicate that it can be immediately useful, and profit- 
able, in the areas of sociology, government, and history, both 
for the professional scholar and for the layman. 

Eustace Mullins, 
9-25-67 Washington, D.C. 


Most of us think of a parasite as something distasteful, whose 
role in life is to feed at the expense of someone else. As a re- 
sult, the term, when applied to humans, is always one of dis- 
gust. In the animal and plant kingdoms, also, the parasite is 
universally disliked. The Oxford English Dictionary (1933) 
defines the term, 

"Parasite — 1. One who eats at the table, or at the expense of, 
another; always an opprobrious application. 

2. Biol. An animal or plant which lives in or upon another 
organism (technically called its host) and draws its nutriment 
directly from it. 

3. (fig.) a person whose part or action resembles that of 
an animal parasite." 

Thus we find that a parasite is one who is disliked, who feeds 
at the expense of another, and who lives in or upon another 
organism which is called the host. We also find that the term 
can be applied to a person whose life follows the classic life 
pattern of the parasite. 

Now, in the study of mankind, we find that there is one 
group or classification of persons who appear persistently in 
the records of the great civilizations. They are always dis- 
liked, yet they remain in the midst of the people who dislike 
them, and if they are driven out, they insist upon returning, 
no matter at what cost to themselves. We also find that they 
always manage to live at the expense of others. 

The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines parasitism as follows: 

"Parasitism — a one-sided nutritive relationship between two 
organisms of different kinds, a relationship which is more or 


less injurious, vet not usually fatal, to the host; a relationship, 
moreover, that relieves the parasite from most of the activity 
or struggle which is usually associated with procuring food, 
and thus tends to favour or induce some degree of simplifica- 
tion or degeneracy." 

In the record of many civilizations, we find that the pre- 
sence of the parasitic group is in many instances fatal to the 
host people, because it effects fundamental changes in the life 
pattern of the host people, and diverts their primary energies 
to the feeding of the parasites. This alteration affects every 
aspect of the host people's existence, and inevitably weakens 
them to the point where they are destroyed. Since the Encyclo- 
paedia Britannica refers above to a purely biological parasitic 
condition in the animal and the plant kingdoms, it is true that 
the parasitic relationship can be injurious without being fatal, 
over a period of time, yet even in these instances, we find many 
examples of plants and animals being killed by parasites, a 
fact which apparently was not known to the learned scholar 
who authored the authoritative Encyclopaedia Britannica 
article on this condition. 

The Encyclopaedia Britannica points out that the parasite 
is relieved of the struggle to procure food. In the history of 
mankind, we find that the known parasitic group never en- 
gages in agriculture, and is rarely known to hunt for its food. 
Instead, food is provided for the parasitic group by a host 
people. Also, and most important, the above writer points out 
that the leading of a parasitic existence produces simplification 
and degeneracy in the parasite. We note throughout history 
that the parasitic group, which differs in fundamental ways 
from the host people, has simplified its life cycle to a single 
factor, that of finding a host and remaining upon it in order 
to feed at its expense. 

We find, too, that the parasitic group is continually de- 
nounced by the more moral elements among the host people, 
because the parasitic group indulges in every known type of 
degeneracy. The reasons for this are obvious. As the Encyclo- 
paedia Britannica article points out, a parasitic existence leads 
to degeneracy. Since the parasite does not have to trouble him- 
self with the active procurement of food, he has plenty of 
time and energy to devote himself to the vilest pursuits, and 


to the debauching of members of the host people. 

The Encyclopaedia Britannica also paragraphs an important 
factor in the present study, the localization of the parasite 
within the host. The Britannica article points out that, 

"Parasites are often localized to a particular site within the 

Since the parasite has reduced its life aims to one goal, that 
of remaining upon the host and feeding at its expense, it must 
choose a location where this is possible. The location must be 
one from which the host cannot readily dislodge it, and it 
must be one which allows the parasite to feed without exertion. 
As a result, the parasite usually chooses a place in or near the 
reproductive organs or the excretory organs of the host. 

Throughout history, the parasitic group has chosen to lo- 
calize itself near the reproductive or the excretory organs of 
the host. In most cases, this has meant settling in the great 
cities of the host people, although, in nations which were pri- 
marily agricultural, the parasitic group managed to disperse 
itself among the villages. 

Webster's Third International Dictionary defines the para- 
site as "2a — an organism living in or on another living organ- 
ism, obtaining from it part or all of its organic nutriment, and 
commonly exhibiting some degree of structural modification." 


This is an important characteristic of the parasitic group in 
the history of mankind. It has exhibited an amazing ability 
to change or to modify itself in order to achieve its parasitic 
goal. It has developed extremely refined techniques for re- 
maining upon the host, and sophisticated methods of continu- 
ing to feed at the host's expense. It has adopted many guises, 
and it has shown a tremendous amount of adaptability for ap- 
pearing in various forms, in order to remain in place. 

To continue with Webster's Third International Dictionary — 

"Parasite — 3. something that resembles the biological para- 
site in dependence upon something else for existence without 
making a useful or adequate return (illus. the great city is a 
parasite on the country — Francois Bondy)." 

This is the last important key to the solution of our problem, 


the decay of human civilization. The parasite depends on 
something else for existence without making a useful or an 
adequate return. Throughout our study of history, we find that 
the parasitic group never makes any return or shows any grati- 
tude for being allowed to feed upon the host. The parasite's 
motto is "always take." Should we be surprised, then to find 
that this motto actually appears in the written literature of a 
known parasitic group? 

We now ask the reader — what group appears and reap- 
pears in the history of one civilization after another? What 
group has always been actively disliked by its host peoples? 
What group has played an often decisive role in the decay 
and collapse of one civilization after another? What group in- 
dulges in every type of degeneracy? What group always local- 
izes to certain positions among the host peoples? And what 
group refuses to fulfill a constructive role in any civilization, 
but instead, remains true to its motto of "Always take", while 
refusing to make a useful or an adequate return? 


This group, as the reader may have already surmised from 
his own studies, is known throughout history as the Jews. Prior 
to the present study, human individuals or groups living at the 
expense of others were often called parasites, but this term 
was used purely in a sociological sense, without any biological 
point of reference. Plantation owners were said to be parasites 
because they lived at the expense of their slaves, aristocrats 
were said to be parasites because they lived at the expense of 
the masses, armies were said to be parasites because they lived 
at the expense of the workers. 

But, in every case, the supposed parasites were performing 
certain duties and fulfilling certain responsibilities in the so- 
ciety. Thus we find that in the purely sociological sense, it 
is possible to name many groups as parasitical, such as children 
and those who are too old to work. They are certainly feeding 
at the expense of others, performing no useful work, and mak- 
ing no adequate return. But these groups either have done 
useful work in the past, or they are expected to do so in the 
future. Thus, they do not fall within the accepted framework 


of the biological definition of a parasite. Throughout this work, 
we will find that the biological references hold true to an 
amazing degree, in establishing the history and the presence 
of a parasitical group, and that in every instance, the records 
of the Jews prove that they are fulfilling the role of biological 


In nature, we find that the parasite often attempts to dis- 
guise its parasitic life cycle, and to appear to be like ordinary 
plants and animals. Thus, a description of the biological plant, 
Krameria, in "The Conditions of Parasitism in Plants", by D. 
T. MacDougal and W. A. Cannon (Carnegie Institution of 
Washington, 1910): 

"The Western United States desert bush Krameria is para- 
sitic on a number of woody hosts. Krameria does not at first 
glance seem to be a parasite, for it does not grow directly upon 
its host, but its roots reach out beneath the ground and tap 
the roots of its host, drawing nutriment therefrom. Its favorite 
host is Covillea tridentata, although it is also parasitic on the 
acacia and a number of other plants. Its condition of parasit- 
ism was discovered after scientists were puzzled that it had no 
deep-going tap root. It is a grayish shrub, bearing fruit and 
leaves at certain seasons of the year." 

The parasite in nature often finds it convenient to disguise 
itself and its aims, and to convince others that it is something 
else, in order to carry out its parasitic mission. Also, the para- 
site is not a species, but a form of life, which preys upon many 
other different species. In this regard, the Jew as a biological 
species is not so much a race, as it is a type which preys upon 
all other races. As Geoffrey LaPage points out, in his definitive 
work, "Parasitic Animals (Cambridge University Press, 1951, 
page 1), 

"A parasitic animal is not a particular species of animal, but 
an animal which has adopted a certain way of living." 

In regard to Krameria's failure to develop a deep tap root, 
which is not necessary for its parasitic existence, we may note 
that the Jew never develops deep roots in any culture of a host 
people, but confines himself to the most superficial and the 


most quickly profitable aspects of its existence. 

Therefore, a Jew is not so much a particular species in the 
civilized world, as he is a type which has adopted a certain 
form of parasitic life and adapted himself to exist upon a host 
which can provide his food. 

LaPage continues, 

"Unlike many other biological terms, the word 'parasite' and 
its adjective 'parasitic' have been taken into the everyday lang- 
uage of men and women, and have, in the course of common 
usage, acquired emotional and moral connotations with which 
science — and therefore biology — has nothing whatever to do. 
The biologists' outlook is scientific, and because it is so, he 
does everything in his power to remove from his studies all 
human likes and dislikes and all human moral judgments. He 
neither despises nor admires, likes or dislikes, condemns or 
approves, the parasitic organism. He studies its way of living 
as dispassionately as he can, seeing parasites as one of the var- 
ious ways of living practiced by different kinds of animals." 


We agree whole heartedly with Professor LaPage's admoni- 
tion to be completely scientific and to follow the resolve not 
to be swayed by emotional judgments. It was precisely by this 
method of dispassionate study that this writer arrived at his 
definition of the biological Jew. Only by studying him un- 
emotionally as a biological phenomenon can we hope to learn 
how to combat the maleficent influence which the parasitic 
body inevitably exerts upon the more advanced human 

LaPage points out that we find, in general, two kinds of 
animal associations, those who belong to one species, such as 
herds, colonies of coral, communities of bees, etc., and two, 
associations of different species in the same area. To this 
second category, parasitism belongs, for we find groups with 
roots in an area entertaining parasites who have no roots in that 
area. One of the more interesting facets of parasitism is that 
the parasite lives an existence which often goes beyond the 
customary laws of nature and of man. The parasite seems not 
to be bound by limiting factors of climate, geography, and 


other elements which play a commanding role in the lives of 
most groups. Thus we find that a parasite can survive in an 
area in which it has no roots, while its host does have roots 
in the area and has established its existence there over a period 
of time. 


LaPage also remarks that parasitism is different from com- 
mensalism, a frequently-encountered biological term which 
means "eating at the same table". He cites as examples of com- 
mensalism, the ox-picker birds which perch upon the backs 
of rhinoceros, elephants and other large animals on the African 
plains. These birds not only eat ticks, lice and other parasites 
which infest the animals, but they also warn the animals of 
approaching danger. 

In England, we find that starlings and sheep have a similar 
commensal arrangement. We also have the phenomenon of 
symbiosis, a biological term meaning "living together". This 
is a somewhat more intimate living arrangement than com- 
mensalism, because we find in symbiosis a physiological de- 
pendence of each partner upon the other. Each one supplies 
some food to the other without which life would be more dif- 
ficult, or even impossible, and neither lives an independent 

Parasitism, however, is defined by LaPage as similar to com- 
mensalism and symbiosis in that the association is based upon 
the need for an adequate food supply. He states that para- 
sitism is an association between one partner, called the para- 
site, which obtains, by a number of different methods, its food 
from the body of the other partner, which is called the host 
of the parasite. But, asks LaPage, does the other partner, the 
host, benefit? He answers that it never does. The host is al- 
ways injured by the parasite. Thus parasitism differs from 
commensalism and symbiosis in two particulars; first, not 
both, but only one of the partners, the parasite, gains a food 
supply, and second, not both, but only one of the partners, 
benefits, while the host always suffers some injury. 


LaPage conjectures that the first parasite may have been 


a non-parasitic organism which penetrated by some route the 
body of another kind of animal, and found some food there, 
such as blood, which was rich in nutrition and easily diges- 
tible, and that, in the course of evolution, the descendants of 
this first parasite liked this way of life, and maintained such an 
association with some other animal. Eventually, these types be- 
came wholly dependent upon parasitism as a way of obtaining 
food and could not survive without following it. Thus it be- 
came an "obligatory parasite", completely dependent physio- 
logically upon its host. As LaPage points out, the host does 
not tolerate passively this association with the parasite, but 
reacts to the injury which it is suffering. He says, 

"The struggle between host and parasite went on according 
to the laws of evolution, and this battle is constantly being 
waged today." 

In pointing out that this battle between host and parasite 
is going on today, is LaPage trying to tell us something? He 
goes on to say that, 

"Parasitism is quite different from the relationship of prey 
and predator, in which one body gets its nourishment by killing 
and absorbing the body of another. Here the predator is always 
larger and stronger than its prey, while the parasite is always 
smaller and weaker than its host." 


Thus we find that here once more the parasite violates a 
fundamental law of nature. It is a law of nature that the 
stronger survives at the expense of the weaker, the survival 
of the fittest, as the weaker is eaten to provide nourishment 
for the strong. In the phenomenon of the parasite, however, 
we find that the weaker survives at the expense of the stronger, 
the least fitted to survive becomes the victor, and the stronger 
is vanquished. 

This too is a fundamental aspect of the life cycle of the bio- 
logical Jew. Throughout history, he has always been smaller 
and weaker than his gentile host, yet he has often managed 
to subdue him. The puny weakling, as celebrated by the Jew- 
ish comedian, Charlie Chaplin, always manages to outwit and 
to defeat his larger and stronger gentile opponent. We find 



that this celebration is a fundamental approach in all Jewish 
humor, literature and art. The small David is shown defeating 
the larger Goliath, the cunning Mordecai is shown defeating 
the stronger gentile official, Haman. David, of course, is the 
small parasite, and Goliath is the large host, who is struck 
down from afar, before he has a chance to use his superior 
strength against the weakling challenger. 


LaPage classifies as "temporary parasites" those insects such 
as mosquitoes and leeches, which suck the blood of the host. 
He names them ectoparasites because they do not enter the 
body of the host. Other lice, which live beneath the skin of 
their hosts, are classified as endoparasites. There are also 
hyperparasites, who live off of other parasites (the rabbinical 
dynasties), and brood or social parasites, which are found in 
ant and bee families, and which live off of the community. 


LaPage points out that every animal, whatever its mode of 
life, is gradually altered by the slow processes of evolution. 
He says that the parasite, far from being an exception to this 
rule, actually exemplifies it. 

"It develops teeth with which to rasp the tissues of the host, 
sucking apparatuses to suck its juices, coagulants to hold onto 
the host body. The remarkable cunning with which some kinds 
of bloodsucking bats stalk their victims and steal their blood 
must also be reckoned among the modifications which their 
temporarily parasitic habits have produced. Species of Des- 
modus attack cattle, horses and other animals, including man 
and poultry, when they are asleep at night. They watch their 
victims carefully, and, when they are asleep, they walk or sidle 
up to them and scoop out a piece of flesh so delicately that the 
sleeping animal often is not aware of the bite until the bleeding 
is discovered in the morning." 

One of the specialized modifications of the Jew is his ability 
to suck the blood of the gentile host without alarming his vic- 
tim, weakening it without being discovered, through the highly 


sophisticated and refined instruments and techniques which 
the Jew has developed over a period of centuries for these 
specific purposes, and which have no counterpart in any other 
species. In view of these techniques, need we be surprised 
that some of the gentiles who have been most weakened by 
the blood-lettings of the Jew are among his most vociferous 
defenders, and who will fight to the death to protect their 
Jewish "benefactors". They are totally unable to recognize 
their danger, or the insidious nature of the parasitic attack. 


LaPage describes a type of parasite called the hagfish, which 
is classified as one of the Cyclostomes, a name whose origin 
refers to the circular opening inside their mouths. He says, 

"All of these fishes have a wormlike shape and perhaps the 
best known of them is the lamprey. The hagfish has two rows 
of teeth on its powerful tongue and one median tooth upon 
the roof of its mouth. Its eyes are very important and are 
buried beneath the skin, probably because the hagfish burrows 
deeply into the tissues of the fish which it attacks, so that 
its eyes have become useless. For the same reason, its gill 
openings are connected by long tubes to a single opening on 
the surface much farther back than the gill openings of the 
lamprey, so that the hagfish can breathe water while its head 
end is buried in the body of the fish upon which it is parasitic. 
Some species of hagfish can attach themselves so firmly by 
means of their sutorial mouths to the living fish that these 
fish can only rarely shake them off. They then rasp off the 
flesh of the fish and suck their blood. Some species of them 
consume the fish muscles until little is left of the living fish 
except its bones and viscera, and the fish dies." 

Thus LaPage offers a complete contradiction of the defini- 
tive and scholarly article of the Encyclopaedia Britannica on 
Parasitism, which contends that the parasite is never fatal to 
the host. The activities of the hagfish, in sucking the blood 
of the still living fish until it dies, closely corresponds to the 
ancient Jewish religious rite of ritual murder, in which the 
healthy gentile victim is strapped down onto a table, ritual 
cuts are made into his flesh, and the flowing blood is drunk by 



the celebrating Jews in one of the most important symbolic acts 
of their parasitic existence. The ceremony of blood-drinking 
continues until the gentile victim expires, in a social re-enact- 
ment of the physical activities of such parasites as the hagfish. 
Here we see the close correlation between the activities of 
parasites in the plant and animal kingdoms and those which 
have developed through the centuries of human civilization. 

LaPage states that many leeches combine organs of attach- 
ment with organs of suction, but others have only organs of 
attachment, such as the hooklets developed by many kinds of 
parasitic animals which are attached either to the exterior or to 
the internal organs of the host. In the same way, when the 
host people of a Jewish community of parasites attempts to 
dislodge it, they find that the parasite has extended specialized 
tentacles of attachment deep into every facet of the host 
people's life. So deeply rooted are these tentacles that the dis- 
lodgement is not only difficult, it is such a demanding and 
painful operation that the dislodgement itself may be fatal 
to the host. 

The host finds that its mortgages are held by Jewish bank- 
ers, its children are being taught by Jewish teachers, its gov- 
ernment is being administered by Jewish "advisers" or "con- 
sultants", who, even if they hold no elective or appointive of- 
fice, still make the important decisions. They turn for solace 
to their religion, and they find that Jewish converts, aided 
by appropriate gifts of money, have entered into the offices 
of their denominations, and have risen rapidly until the relig- 
ious beliefs are altered to embrace all of the tenets of the 
parasitic community of Jews. What, then, does the gentile 
host have left? The seemingly inevitable doom of being slowly 
bled to death, after which the parasites will leave the body 
of their victim and seek another host. 


LaPage points out that in many instances, the adult phases' 
of the parasite do not move much about the host's body, be- 
cause they are surrounded by food and can obtain it without 
the help of locomotive organs. Thus, we find that the Jews are 
not much interested in the transportation industry, preferring 



the more sedentary occupations. The parasitic community ac- 
tually can and does become completely immobile in the host 
for long periods of time, because it is characterized by the 
ability of dormancy, of lying without moving through the 
years, while losing none of its potency. We find that ticks 
bearing infectious diseases can remain in the ground for as long 
as one hundred years, and when they emerge, they are still 

Jewish communities have established themselves in gentile 
nations and remained for hundreds of years without exhibiting 
any signs of being dangerous to their hosts, but, if the gentile 
host attempts to dislodge them, they immediately rise to the 
challenge and bring into play their specialized modifications 
for remaining upon the host. LaPage points out that parasites 
are naturally inclined to lead a sedentary life, "and undergo 
the modifications to which this mode of life leads." 

As a result of their parasitic mode of life, the Jewish com- 
munities have developed sedentary habits, which in turn have 
led to certain diseases, directly attributable to this sedentary 
life, and which had been known for their high incidence among 
the Jews. Thus diabetes is referred to in many medical dic- 
tionaries as "the Jewish disease". 

Diabetes occurs principally because the sedentary and para- 
sitic life prevents Jews from burning up the excess blood sugars 
which they ingest in their diet, and which are intended for 
use as direct forms of energy. This causes a surfeit of sugar 
in the system, which becomes the disease of diabetes. Also, 
generations of sedentary persons cause malfunctions or the 
gradual weakening of the pancreas and other organs which 
are responsible for controlling the level of blood sugar. Thus, 
diabetes becomes a hereditary disease among generations of 
sedentary people. 

The Jewish community has developed a number of degen- 
erative types of diseases, such as blood disorders, cancers of 
various kinds, and other forms of physical degeneration, which 
are directly attributable to their mode of parasitic existence, 
and to the physical degeneracy which it produces. As they 
cohabit with the gentile community, and as their sedentary 
mode of life becomes more widely practiced, these degenera- 
tive diseases begin to appear throughout the host community. 



In one of the most important physical correlations between 
the Jewish community and the known types of parasitic or- 
ganisms in the plant and animal kingdoms, LaPage says: 

"Among other organs which are often reduced or lost when 
parasitic life is adopted is the nervous system. It may be re- 
duced as a whole or the reduction may affect chiefly the eyes 
and other organs. Organs of special sense are best developed 
in active animals which feed upon other animals and need 
to defend themselves against their enemies. They are not re- 
quired by parasitic animals which live a relatively sheltered 
existence on or inside the bodies of their hosts amid a relative 
abundance of food." 

The effect of a parasitic mode of existence upon the nervous 
system, which can be observed in many types of parasites, are 
especially noteworthy in the Jew. The degeneration of the ner- 
vous system into a state of severe mental illness in an average 
of thirty percent, of all Jews has long been supposed by sociolo- 
gists to be due to the physical interbreeding in the Jewish 
community, but the high incidence of mental illness in Jews 
whose families have intermarried with gentiles is the same 
rate as those who have remained within the Jewish commun- 
ity. This points to a strictly biological origin of this degeneracy 
of the nervous system, and bears out Professor LaPage' s con- 
tention that the leading of a parasitic mode of existence inevit- 
ably leads to a reduction or a degeneracy of the nervous 


One of the most striking observations which LaPage has 
made in this study of animal parasites is his discovery that, 

"Because this mode of life tends to cause a loss of (skeletal) 
structure resistant enough to be preserved as fossils, we have 
little geological evidence of the past history of parasitic ani- 
mals. At least six species of fossil roundworms, however, have 
been described, two of these, Hydonius antiquus and H. matu- 
tinus in the Eocene lignite, and the other four in Baltic amber." 

The effortless existence led by the parasite not only affects 
its nervous system, which, like any other physical attribute, 
tends to atrophy when not used or required by the animal, but 



it also leads, over a period of time, to extensive skeletal changes 
in the structure of the animal, tending towards a soft, amorp- 
hous bone structure which soon disintegrates after the death 
of the parasite. Here is another remarkable correlation between 
the life cycles of parasitic animals and the life cycle of the Jew. 
Because of their parasitic mode of existence, the Jews have 
left no artifacts which could be discovered among the ruins of 
ancient civilization, even though they are known to have been 
present for long periods of time during these civilizations. Des- 
pite the historical records of their presence, we can find no 
concrete artifacts signifying their existence. 


Because we have heard, and still hear, so much about the 
great Jewish cultures of the past, archeologists have made ex- 
tensive efforts to discover some examples of Jewish art and 
sculpture and architecture in ancient cultures, the solid evi- 
dences which survive the ravages of time and natural catas- 
trophes. Yet they found nothing. The sole results of these 
searches are a few pieces of crude waterpots, fashioned from 
mud, which a Stone Age man could have produced with his 
bare hands, since he did not know the use of the pottery wheel 
which made its appearance among early civilizations. These 
scanty evidences of the great Jewish past is but one more 
witness to the biological parasitical existence which the Jew 
has always led as a soft, amorphous and rootless creature feed- 
ing at the expense of others, and leaving no concrete artifacts 
to memorialize his presence. 

LaPage says, "Human writings about some species of para- 
sitic animals take us back to the earliest records of man. The 
Egyptian Papyrus from 1600 B.C. refers to tapeworms, blood 
flukes and hookworms of man." 

Thus the biological parasite has been a problem of man since 
the dawn of recorded history. Although humans have been 
aware of the physical discomfort and danger which animal 
parasites have always presented to him, they have consistently 
failed to recognize the specific danger of the Jewish parasite 
until it was too late. 

LaPage says, "The parasitic animal has to contend with dif- 



ficulties and risks to which non-parasites are not exposed. It 
may have gained shelter and abundance of food, but it has 
obtained these at the cost of partial or complete dependence 
upon its hosts. The parasitic animal must find it and get into 
it or on its surface and it must maintain itself in these 

Thus the Jew encounters several dangers which do not ordi- 
narily imperil other types of communities. Foremost among 
these is the danger of genocide, of actions against its commun- 
ity as a group, when the host discovers that its presence is 
endangering its health. The Jew is the only human group which 
has repeatedly undergone mass actions, or pogroms, against it. 

Because of its parasitic mode of existence, the Jewish com- 
munity made no effort to develop a nation or an independent 
state during thousands of years of recorded history. This meant 
that the Jew had no standing army for his defense against 
enemies. When a Jewish state, Israel, was finally established, 
the nation's budget identified it as an extension of the parasitic 
community, for seventy per cent, of its national budget con- 
sisted of contributions from abroad, and thirty per cent, from 
the sale of bonds which, of course, were worthless and which 
would never be paid off. 


Because of its total dependence upon the gentile host, the 
Jewish parasite develops a deep hatred and a contempt for the 
animals which provide it with food and shelter. This hatred is 
a protective frame which acts as a shield for the Jewish com- 
munity, and prevents it from accepting the life and goals of 
the host people for its own. Herbert Spencer may have been 
focussing upon the Jewish parasitic phenomenon when he 

"If a group places a premium on the quality of enmity, in 
contrast with that of amity, a criminal type evolves." 

Since the Jew is the only group which places a premium on 
the quality of enmity, Spencer must have been making an 
oblique reference to the Jewish parasite. From the standpoint 
of the host people, everything that the Jew does is a mani- 
festation of a criminal act, but from the parasite's standpoint, 



he is only following the procedures of his life cycle which have 
evolved and been established over a period of thousands of 
years. The conflict comes from two separate and irreconcilable 
codes of ethics, that of the host, which places a premium upon 
decency, honor and self-reliance, and that of the parasite, 
which operates from an established modus vivendi of 

The Jew lives in constant fear of rejection, of being thrown 
off of the host, which would mean his starvation and death. 
As a result, the Jew sees everything in the light of how he 
"relates" to the host, or how he maintains his parasitic situation. 


The adaptive modifications of the parasite are attempts to 
anticipate possible changes in the host. LaPage says, "Other 
parasites correlate their life histories with that of the host; the 
monogenetic fluke, Polystoma integerrimum, which lives in 
the bladder of the common frog, ignores all tadpoles which 
have reached a stage of development in which they can sur- 
vive in them, but when it meets with one which has, its aim- 
less behaviour ceases; it seems to pause and await its oppor- 
tunity to dart through the spoutlike opening into the bag 
around the internal gills. How it knows the tadpole has reached 
this stage of internal development we do not know, but per- 
haps it is helped by its eye spots and its nervous system or 
by chemical substances secreted by the tadpole into the water 
which stimulate the miracidium larva." 

The extrasensory ability of the parasite to spot a suitably 
developed host has always been characteristic of the Jews. 
From earliest history, he has made unerringly for the most ad- 
vanced and the most promising civilizations, ignoring the 
more backwards or undeveloped peoples. Thus, we do not find 
the Jew sharing the Spartan existence of the pygmies in the 
Ituri rain forest; he is living in a comfortable apartment in 
New York, dining on caviar and champagne. 


LaPage observes that the timing of the release of the para- 



sitic animals reproductive phases so that they may infect the 
host is also shown by some species of protozoa which live in 
the rectum of the frog. Here again we note the affinity of the 
parasite for the excretory organs, the previously mentioned 
Polystoma integerrimum, which resides in the bladder of the 
frog, and the protozoa which prefer the rectum of the frog 
as the most suitable environment for its life. 

LaPage states that the dormancy of parasites is a continuous- 
ly observed phenomenon, retaining their potency during many 
years of inactivity and isolation. Thus, a community of Jews 
may live torpidly in its ghetto for centuries, seemingly self- 
absorbed in its own parochial existence, and having little ef- 
fect upon its gentile host, under some combination of factors 
will cause it to become furiously active. In a short time, it 
permeates every aspect of the host people's existence, and 
brings it to the point of destruction. The community of Jews 
in the Frankfort ghetto in Germany is a good illustration of 
this type of parasitic dormancy. It remained dormant for 
three hundred years, and within the span of a single gener- 
ation, produced a group of bankers and traders who soon won 
control of the destinies of Western civilization. 


LaPage points out that parasites cause defense reactions in 
the host against a parasitic invader, such as efforts to localize 
and neutralize the injurious effects of the parasite, attempts 
to repair the damage done, and efforts to kill or to remove 
the parasite. He describes these as "tissue reactions", and 
these are primarily local reactions, but more advanced re- 
actions, such as a resistance immunity, may be developed by 
the host as the reaction of the entire organism. He says that 
tissue reactions are inflammations caused by bacteria, "viruses 
and inanimate agencies, and may be acute or chronic. They 
are the results of injury or irritation caused by organs or 
teeth of the parasitic animal, by its migration through these 
tissues, or by chemical substances which it secretes or ex- 
cretes into the body of the host." 

LaPage goes on at some length to describe the various 



types of damage which the parasite inflicts upon the host. 
He says that in addition to these various tissue damages, 
parasites introduce other types of parasites into the host, as 
well as dangerous viruses. The parasites may produce sub- 
stances which are injurious to the host, toxins or other kinds 
of poisons. In effect, then, the parasite begins to exercise a 
dangerous influence over the life cycle of the host, one which 
goes far beyond the simple goal of remaining attached to the 
host and obtaining food from it. Whether the parasite con- 
sciously intends it or not, it gradually becomes the most im- 
portant single influence in the life of the host. The story of 
the newspaper business in the United States is a typical 
example. A century ago, newspapers were small and insig- 
nificant in this country, while the profession of journalism 
ranked only slightly above the professions of ratcatcher and 
garbage hauler. As the Jews began to assume a more prominent 
role in the life of the gentile host, they found that newspapers 
were an essential vehicle for their goals. They began to flood 
everyone with newspapers, and the newspapers became virus 
carriers of various forms of mental poisons and toxins which 
either stupefied, confused or paralyzed the gentile host, put- 
ting it into a state of suspended animation as long as these 
venoms could be maintained. 


As LaPage points out, the parasite introduces other types 
of parasites into the host. We find that when the Jews obtained 
control of the United States Immigration Service in the 1890s, 
through such Jewish Commissioners as Straus and Cohen, the 
gates were opened for a flood of Jewish immigrants from the 
ghettoes of Europe, most of whom had been excluded pre- 
viously on grounds of illiteracy, criminal backgrounds, and 
various forms of physical contagions or mental illnesses. 

LaPage also says, "Parasites may cause biological changes 
such as species which cause changes in the host's reproductive 
glands, parasitic castration, such as the parasitic crustacean 
Sacculina, which destroys the reproductive organs of the host, 
the short-tailed spider cram, Inacus mauritanicus, which is at- 
tacked by Sacculina neglecta. The effects of Sacculina cause 



seventy per cent, of male crabs to acquire some of the second- 
ary sexual characteristics of the female. The abdomen of these 
males becomes broad, they may acquire, in addition to their 
male copulating styles, appendages modified to bear eggs, and 
their nippers become smaller at the same time." 

It is inevitable that the enormous effect which the parasite 
has upon the host would result in some biological alterations 
such as the effect of Sacculina upon Inacus mauritanicus. We 
have seen in America during the past quarter of a century, 
coincident with the great power attained by the Jews in every 
walk of life, startling modifications in the appearances and 
habits of American males, as well as a vast increase in the 
public practice of male homosexuality. American males have 
taken on some of the secondary sexual characteristics of the 
female, and they have shown amazing declines in such primary 
male characteristics as energy, aggressiveness, and physical 

The traditional roles of the sexes have also undergone 
sweeping changes, due principally to Jewish agitation for 
"sexual equality". This campaign has not resulted in sexual 
equality, since this equality could only be attained by eradi- 
cating all physical differences between males and females. 
However, it has resulted in a decline of masculine traits in 
the American male, as well as psychological confusion as to 
his role. This development can be equated with the pernicious 
influence which the parasite exercises upon the host, as LaPage 
describes the encounter of Sacculina with Inacus mauritanicus. 
Here again, we note the remarkable activity and influence of 
the parasite in relation to the reproductive and the excretory 
organs of the host. 


LaPage notes throughout his definitive studies of the para- 
site-host relationship that the host's defense against the para- 
site is always of an activist or a reactionary nature, such as 
cattle switching their tails, fish taking evasive action in sud- 
den, unpredictable twists and turns, and other wild actions 
which they hope will dislodge the parasite. During the five 
thousand years that history has recorded the presence of the 



biological parasite in civilized communities, we cannot find a 
single shred of evidence that the host people has ever treated 
the parasite phenomenon in any but an activist manner, an 
unthinking, involuntary action to dislodge the parasite. 

The host instinctively reacts against the presence of the 
parasite, because it knows it will suffer an injury from this 
strange creature, with its differing life cycle and goals. This 
is why the Jews always call those who oppose them "reaction- 
aries", that is, those who react against the presence of the 
parasite. Consequently, one of the major tasks of the parasite 
is to seek out all potential "reactionaries" among the host 
people and eliminate them. 


Because of this blind, unthinking reaction, which seldom is 
effective in ridding the host of the parasite, LaPage says, 

"The basic essential of any campaign against a parasitic 
animal is a thorough knowledge of every phase of its life 
history and also of its relationships with all the hosts with 
which it can live. We need to know all the hosts because some 
of them may be reservoir hosts maintaining sources of the 
parasites which can then infect man. With this knowledge, we 
can select for attack the weakest points in the life history and 
biology of the parasitic animal." 

Research and education, then, are the tools which are 
needed to counterattack against the evil influence of the para- 
site. Above all, we must avoid blind, instinctive reaction, since 
the parasite has long since learned how to anticipate and con- 
trol such reaction, and even to use it for its own advantage. 


LaPage points out that "Host and parasitic animal must 
always be considered together, because the parasitic animal is, 
like all other living things, intimately related throughout its 
existence to its environment. The fact that environment is, for 
a part or whole of its life, the surface or interior of another 
animal, does not absolve the parasitologist from the biologists' 
practice of considering animal and environment together as a 



whole. A second objective is the demonstration that some 
species of parasitic animals are among the most powerful ene- 
mies of man and his civilization." 

The parasite's concern with his environment sheds light upon 
one of the most important intellectual developments of modern 
man, the Enlightenment, that revolutionary force which has 
spearheaded the growing control of the parasite over the host. 
The pre-Enlightenment centuries of human thought considered 
man's environment as a secondary consideration, because of 
faith in the powers of the individual, and the belief that the 
individual could triumph over his environment. After the sud- 
den importance given to such French intellectuals as Jean 
Jacques Rousseau, man was no longer considered as important 
as his environment. All at once, our leading thinkers decided 
that environment was the most important thing in life. And 
indeed it is, to the parasite, whose environment is the host 
which feeds him. 

But to the host, who is making his own way in life, environ- 
ment is not the primary factor in his development. But to the 
parasite, environment is everything. All Socialist thinkers, and 
the various schools of sociological thought which have crept 
out of this development, place primary importance upon man's 
environment, rather than upon his powers to use that environ- 
ment and to create a life for himself, as he achieves his 
life's goals. 

When we understand the theory of the parasite, we are able 
to understand, FOR THE FIRST TIME, the entire modern 
Socialist school of thought, because we can recognize it for 
what it is, the environmental psychology which the parasite 
has developed around his own life cycle. As such, it negates all 
of the host's thought, goals and culture. 

LaPage urges us to remember that the parasite is among 
the most powerful enemies of man and his civilization. Here 
again, he seems on the verge of going into the Jewish problem, 
but he shies away from applying his theories to the problems 
of human sociology. Certainly he could not have been referring 
to parasitic viruses, or to the blood-sucking mosquitoes, for 
even if they hindered the building of the Panama Canal, they 
cannot be said to have caused the collapse of any human civili- 
zation. What could he mean but the biological parasite which 



has infested man's civilization since the beginning of recorded 
history, and which has brought about the downfall of one em- 
pire after another? Perhaps that is why he urges us to select 
for attack "the weakest points, in the life history and the bio- 
logy of the parasitic animal." 




During the twentieth century, man has begun to concern 
himself with the problem of the collapse of world cultures, 
great empires which rise to their zenith, and then mysteriously 
decline. We know why they rise. They grow because a people 
finds itself with a mission, or because it develops techniques 
for mastering its surroundings. A people takes advantage of 
favorable conditions, because they have the will to carry out 
their mission. During the period when the people are able to 
channel their energies constructively, a nation grows amazingly 
in size and power, in a geometric ratio. Then, suddenly, it 
begins to sicken and die. One example was Elizabethan Eng- 
land, which had expelled the Jews. When Oliver Cromwell 
brought back the Jews, the English people lost their sense of 
direction, and although their momentum was still sufficient 
to carry them on an upward course through the Victorian per- 
iod, today we find that their aristocracy has been dispossessed, 
and their assets, although greatly reduced, are administered 
by aliens. 

Two scholars have formulated theories, developed through 
many years of study, to explain this process of the downfall 
of nations. The first, Oswald Spengler*, was a German scholar 
of unique power and energy. He compiled interlocking records 
of every known civilization, and carried on intricate com- 
parative studies which today could only be done by an elec- 

* The Decline of the West, by Oswald Spengler, 
English edition, Knopf, NY 1926. 



tronic computer, so complex was his mastery of conjunctive 
or interweaving factors. 

Spengler concluded that a civilization is a body like any 
other, which is subject to the laws which govern natural bodies. 
He saw that a civilization had its birth stage, a young and vig- 
orous stage, and an old age which left it weak and prey to its 
enemies. In proposing this biological pattern for civilizations, 
Spengler was on the right track. Nor was he insensitive to the 
fact that civilizations develop internal problems which func- 
tion, like a fatal disease. Only on one point did he seem to be 
blind, the concept of the parasite. This is not too strange, for 
Spengler was greatly concerned with the finer aspects of hu- 
man culture, the greatest achievements of man, his art, his 
music, his poetry, his architecture. Of course a scholar of this 
elevated turn of mind did not wish to concern himself with 
degenerative things which creep and entwine themselves about 
the reproductive and the excretory organs of man, those para- 
sitic organisms which cause discomfort, disease and death. 


A second explorer of this ground was Arnold Toynbee, a 
donnish Englishman. He was equally reluctant to face the 
omnipresent and distasteful fact of the biological Jew. He em- 
barked upon a vast study of civilization, which covered es- 
sentially the same ground as Spengler, and added little to 
Spengler's findings. His sole original contribution was a theory 
which immediately became popular with the intellectual 
lightweights of the time, since it conformed to their own pre- 
judices. It was cast in the accepted pseudo-sociological jargon 
which university nitwits employ to bemuse their students 
and each other. 

Civilizations fall, declared Toynbee, because of a "failure 
of nerve"; at some point in its development, a civilization, 
which lives by a system of "challenge and response", fails to 
respond to some challenge, and goes down before it. 

Now, this could refer to the biological Jew, since the para- 
site is a challenge to the continued threat of the host. How- 
ever, it is a challenge which no gentile host has ever been 



prepared to meet. It is a germ which is best defeated by 
inoculation, or by personal cleanliness and careful attention 
to matters of health. 

Spengler's history of the decline and fall of civilizations 
could not be upheld because it did not take into consideration 
the obvious fact that few, if any, civilizations, had died of old 
age. Nearly all of them had been murdered, in one way or 
another, but Spengler was too preoccupied with the fine arts 
to become interested in the problems of crime and disease. 

Toynbee, on the other hand, could not be the detective in 
this case because he had lived most of his life on a subsidy 
from the criminal classes. His years of study had been financed 
by generous grants from the Royal Institute of International 
Affairs, one of a network of organizations which had been set 
up by international Jewish bankers as useful pawns in their 
operations. The sister organization of the RIIA in the United 
States is the Council on Foreign Relations, which I was the 
first to uncover as the principal power holding company of the 
parasitic Establishment in this country. In the first edition of 
Mullins on the Federal Reserve, in 1952, a biographical note 
on the back cover announced that I was completing a sequel 
to the Federal Reserve book which would be an expose of the 
Council on Foreign Relations. This was the first time that any 
American nationalist had ever publicly called attention to this 
organization. A few months later, a New York Jew via Hun- 
gary, Dr. Emanuel Josephson, rushed into print with a book 
on the Council on Foreign Relations, which attempted to 
show that it was an instrument of gentiles such as the Rocke- 
fellers, and not a front for the parasitic Jewish community. 
I visited him and we talked for seven hours. It was quite 
obvious that he knew everything that I knew about the Council 
on Foreign Relations, whose offices were only a few doors from 
his home, and it was also obvious that he had placed a dif- 
ferent interpretation on his findings. 

Just as Emanuel Josephson refused to face the facts about 
the Council on Foreign Relations, so Arnold Toynbee, living 
on comfortable grants from the Rothschild family, found no 
evidence of parasitical weakenings of civilizations in his vast 
work, ("A Study of History", by Arnold Toynbee, Oxford, 
1934.) Instead, Toynbee superficially studied the nerve pat- 



terns of cultures, and the stimuli which affected them, without 
once mentioning the most vicious enemy of the nervous sys- 
tem, the parasite. When Toynbee says that a civilization failed 
to respond to a challenge, he asks us to believe that a man 
who is standing on a street corner, and who is knocked down 
from behind by a runaway truck, has failed to respond to a 
challenge. The fact is that he has been killed. 


Has Toynbee ever heard of biology? Has he ever heard of 
parasites? We find no evidence of it in his encyclopaedic stu- 
dies. Does he have any inkling that civilizations allow foreign 
bodies to settle in their midst, to flourish and operate without 
supervision and control, no matter how pernicious their influ- 
ence may be? How could Toynbee spend twenty years in the 
study of ancient civilizations without knowing that the Jews 
opened the gates of Babylon to the Persian invaders, without 
knowing how the Jews brought Rome to its knees, without 
knowing how the Jews subjected Egypt to a terrible dictator- 
ship for three hundred years, until the Egyptians rose and 
drove them out? Only a great intellectual pervert, in the pay 
of the parasites, could conceal such information after having 
uncovered it. A comparable deed would be Pasteur destroying 
the records of his rabies vaccine after discovering it, or Jenner 
concealing the formula for his smallpox remedy. 


The study of the biological parasite reveals a pattern, a set 
of characteristic and interweaving facts of nature: 1. the 
parasite prefers a healthy organism as a feeding ground; 2. the 
parasite's life cycle depends upon its finding a host upon which 
it can feed; 3. a healthy organism which is invaded by a para- 
sitic organism is inevitably injured and often dies from the 
evil effect of the parasitic presence. Most often, the parasite 
causes the host to lose its sense of direction, so that it becomes 
helpless and is unable to defend itself against its exterior 

This pattern embraces a set of factors which have been com- 



mon to every great civilization which has suddenly sickened 
and died. Was Mr. Toynbee, in his decades of concentrated 
study, unable to discern a single one of them? Apparently, 
the answer is yes. We see a state of affairs in which a people 
has built, through its own efforts, a great empire, whose ships 
trade with far-off lands, whose armies are invincible. This 
people is strong, self-confident, and aware of their virtues. Why 
should they fear a few shabby, furtive aliens who have drifted 
in from unknown places, and who establish themselves in the 
heart of the city so unobtrusively that it seems they have al- 
ways been there? These aliens are willing to do anything, they 
perform any sort of distasteful task which the natives feel is 
beneath them. The aliens traffic in the bodies of girls, set up 
gambling dens, deal in stolen goods, lend money, establish 
houses in which one can perform every imaginable type of 
sexual degeneracy, and provide assassins for hire. 


In a short time, the aliens know every secret of the people's 
leaders, and they have established holds over them. The colony 
of aliens multiplies rapidly, and soon a once healthy people 
finds itself helpless, because their native virtues of strength, 
courage and honor, which have made them great, are of no 
avail against the newcomers. The host does not understand the 
parasite, which is like a creature from another planet, be- 
cause they do not have the same goals, nor do they respond 
to the same stimuli, as the host people. They even seem to 
have different nerve patterns. As the pernicious influence 
grows, the army is demoralized, the native leaders are mur- 
dered or exiled, and the wealth of the nation swiftly passes 
into the hands of the aliens. The people are plundered of 
everything, and most of all of their self-respect. No member 
of a host people is allowed to preserve his self-respect or his 
privacy, once the parasite has taken command. 

One morning, the ships of a rival nation appear in the har- 
bor. In exchange for certain guarantees, the parasites welcome 
them. The host people does not resist, an empire is gone. Now, 
this process is not a typical life pattern of a culture a la 
Spengler; neither is it a challenge and response a la Toynbee. 
The host people could have repelled any other attack by an 



armed invader, but they could not fight against the onset of 
a furtive parasite and the inevitable decay which he brought 
with him, a disease which affected and paralyzed the entire 
organism of the people. 


The theory of the biological parasite explains for the first 
time the fall of Egypt, of Babylon, of Rome, of Persia, and of 
England. A prosperous, healthy people allows a foreign body 
to establish itself in their midst. The foreign body paralyzes 
and destroys them. This new concept of history brings both 
Spengler and Toynbee up to date. It also offers a civilization, 
for the first time, an opportunity to escape the fate of its 

The serious student may find himself appalled by the more 
repulsive aspects of the study of the biological parasite. He 
finds that one type of fish in the South Seas has a long, taper- 
ing body, and that it enters the rear of larger fish, and feeds 
upon the feces within. Man is plagued by a tapeworm which 
enters his body, hooks onto the large intestine with a hook 
which he has developed solely for that purpose, and begins to 
absorb the nourishment from the food eaten by man. Various 
forms of lice secrete themselves around the reproductive or 
the excretory organs of man and cause him extreme discomfort. 

Parasites find that the waste matter excreted by humans is 
a fertile breeding ground for them, because the human is a 
higher form of life which uses large quantities of food and 
excretes much of it with the food values intact. These excre- 
tions provide rich food for the parasite, but his attachment 
to it poses health problems for humans. Consequently, hu- 
mans try to dispose of their waste matter so that it will not 
become a breeding ground for various obnoxious forms of para- 
sites. The parasite considers this to be very cruel and unjust, 
and he endeavours by any means to reach it. If he endangers 
the life of the human, so what? A fly on a manure pile is not 
concerned as to whether he poses a threat to the health of 

It follows that the parasite which has established itself upon 



the gentile host does not care how much it injures the host. 
Its only goal is to lead a parasitic life at the expense of the 
host, and its natural objectives are usually the reproductive and 
the excretory organs. Throughout history, we find the Jew 
entwined about the reproductive organs of the gentile host 
like a parasitic vine which is slowly strangling a healthy tree. 
The Jew has always functioned best as a panderer, a porno- 
grapher, a master of prostitution, an apostle of sexual perver- 
sion, an enemy of the prevailing sexual standards and pro- 
hibitions of the gentile community. When the title of 
"America's largest pornographer" was bestowed by police in- 
vestigators, who was the holder of the title? One Irving Klaw 
of New York, who carried on a vast business in nude photo- 
graphs and other items of the trade. 

Other Jews, of great intellectual aspirations, have become 
writers, transforming our literature into dreary recitals of sex- 
ual acts, and making it impossible to publish anything which 
fails to conform to their standards of depravity. Other intellec- 
tual Jews have created a new profession, one so characteristic 
of them that it is known everywhere as a Jewish profession. 
This is the profession of psychiatry, an outgrowth of the para- 
site's obsession with the reproductive and excretory habits of 
the host. What is the basis of the "science" of psychiatry, as 
it has been formulated by its Jewish founder and patron saint, 
Sigmund Freud? The basis of psychiatry is the "anal com- 
plex", the theory that an obsession with the anus is the prin- 
cipal influence in our emotional development. Many millions 
of words have been written on this subject, despite its distaste- 
ful connotations, and learned speeches about the anal com- 
pulsion are delivered by scholars before the world's learned 
bodies of distinguished men. 


With the anal complex setting the tasteful tone of the para- 
site's obsessions, the Jew has gone on to develop other theories 
about the processes of human excretion. The most important 
influence in the modern school of progressive education is 
the science of toilet training, while much of modern art is 
based, and easily recognizable in its origins, upon the feces 



complex, or the handling of its stool by the pre-school child. 
Other important contributions of Jewish psychiatric thought, 
which have been hailed as major intellectual developments of 
tremendous depth and scope, are too filthy to be repeated here. 

When one contemplates the spectacle of a great hall, filled 
with well-dressed and well-educated men and women from 
many countries, who are listening intently, and occasionally 
applauding, a little Jew in a tuxedo who is delivering a learned 
dissertation upon the anal and excretory habits of mankind, 
we realize yet another aspect of the Jew. No matter what he 
does, the Jew is so fantastic that he becomes a comic figure. 
When the former Premier of France, Mendes-France, an- 
nounced that his nation was surrendering the huge French 
investment in Vietnam to the Communists, one hardly knew 
whether to laugh or cry, so comic was the bulging-eyed 
black-jowled image of a rag merchant howling "O-o-o-l-l-d-d- 
ra-a-a-a-ggz-z-uh-" through the streets. 

The poet Ezra Pound once observed to me that when he 
began to suggest to people that Jews were exercising undue 
power in the gentile world, no one took him seriously, because 
everyone knew that Jews were only clowns. As usual, the Jew 
used this impression to fix his position upon the gentile host. 
Charlie Chaplin, with his racially characteristic gestures, em- 
ployed his typically obscene movements to be hailed as a great 
comic genius by the indefatigable international Jewish claque. 
He made millions of dollars by wagging his behind at the 
audience, scratching frantically at his buttocks, and exhibiting 
the usual run of the parasite's age-old preoccupations with 
the reproductive and the excretory organs. 

In his own right, Sigmund Freud is an even greater comedian 
than Charlie Chaplin, because the Freudian theories of human 
behaviour, as the great gentile psychologist, Carl Jung, re- 
minded us, are based upon the biological parasite's enormous 
misconceptions of the nature of his gentile host, and Freud's 
theories are even more comical than the gyrations of Charlie 
Chaplin. Yet we laugh at Chaplin, and study the theories of 
Freud seriously. 


Another obsession of the parasite is that it must force its 



way into every aspect of the host's existence. It cannot endure 
the thought of a group of gentiles discussing anything without 
the parasite or one of his shabez goi agents being present to 
make notes. Thus, the Jew campaigns to force his way into 
every gentile organization, whether it be social, religious, a 
private school, a club, or a neighborhood, anywhere that the 
gentiles might be able to gather and talk over things which 
the Jew wishes to know. 

This obsession is due to the fact that the Jew can never know 
any real security in his parasitic existence. He lives daily with 
the terrible fear that the host will cast him off, and even 
when he has obtained control at every level of the gentile's 
life, the Jew still feels insecure. If the gentile manages to keep 
him out of anything, the Jew becomes wild with rage. 


This obsession with security was the real force behind the 
furore over the Dreyfus case in France during the last century. 
A Jew named Captain Dreyfus had managed to penetrate the 
formerly all gentile French High Command. Soon afterwards, 
he was charged with selling French military secrets to the 
highest bidder. Although it was an open and shut case, as 
usual, the Jews launched a frantic international campaign to 
free him. It seemed odd that so much noise was raised over 
the fate of one French officer, but the theory of the biological 
parasite explains the mystery. The parasite had penetrated 
one of the last bastions of the gentile host. Now he knew all 
the military secrets, and he was also in a position to inform 
his people if the army should become involved in a reaction 
against the presence of the parasites. But the parasite was ar- 
rested and charged as a traitor, which he was, because his 
primary loyalty was to the parasitic community. The tragedy 
is not that he is convicted, but that the Jews have lost their 
man in the nation's security council. At once, the entire para- 
site community charges to his defense, exhibiting terrible fear 
and anger. This rejection or exclusion is the fate which haunts 
the parasite, because, for him, it is a matter of life and death. 
If he is rejected by the host, he cannot lead a parasitic exist- 
ence, and he will die. Hence the great furore over the 



Dreyfus case. 


Democratic administrations in the United States have had 
a plethora of Dreyfus cases in recent years, in which a parasite 
who had burrowed into the nation's security councils was 
charged with disloyalty. One of them was Dr. Oppenheimer, 
a Jew whose social circle was composed of dedicated Com- 
munist agents, most of whom were known as such while he 
worked on our nation's most vital defense secrets. He was fin- 
ally denied a security clearance, due to public alarm over his 
background, and a terrible clamor arose from the international 
Jewish community, which went on for years. We still do not 
know how much damage he did to the nation. 

A more celebrated case was a Jew of Russian origins, Walt 
Rostow. He is only the person in charge of our national secur- 
ity! Yet a few years ago, loyal employees of the State De- 
partment refused Rostow a security clearance, not once, but 
three times, because of his notorious associations. Yet when 
John F. Kennedy became President, he placed Walt Rostow 
in charge of our national security! 

Drew Pearson recently revealed that it was this Jew who 
made the personal decision to employ American troops in large 
forces in Vietnam, one of the greatest victories for Commun- 
ism since 1917. While Americans were being slaughtered in 
Vietnam, Russia could sit back and see us bleed to death 
without the Communist world being weakened at all. In this 
Dreyfus case, the Jews have won every round, while the 
gentile who exposed him, Otto Otepka, is still being per- 
secuted by "our" government. 


In France, a few clever gentiles sensed which way the wind 
was blowing in the Dreyfus case, even if they had no under- 
standing of the parasitic theory. An obscure hackwriter named 
Emile Zola wrote some fiery articles, such as "J'Accuse"', de- 
manding that Dreyfus be freed, and the international Jewish 
propaganda machine immediately began to puff Zola as a 
great writer. He enjoyed great fame and fortune during the 



rest of his life, although his novels are now ignored. 

A pompous little country lawyer, Clemenceau, also found 
his career in the Dreyfus case. He intervened on Dreyfus' 
behalf, and the Jews made him Premier of France. The way 
of the shabez goi can be smoothed. 

The threat of rejection always stirs a torrent of fear and 
anger in the parasite. This writer encountered an example of 
this when he purchased a secondhand mattress in Jersey City. 
Late that night, he was awakened by an unwelcome presence. 
He switched on the light, and there on his stomach was a fat 
little bedbug, swollen with its feast, and reluctant to abandon 
its host even in the light of exposure. When the light came 
on, the bedbug gave a furious shriek of anger, and waddled out 
of sight. At this time, the writer did not immediately relate 
this episode to the theory of the biological parasite, but he 
later reflected that this anger of the bedbug, which was carry- 
ing on its usual activity, was understandable. We cannot ex- 
pect the Jew to appreciate any effort of the gentile host to dis- 
lodge him, and remove him from the feast. This is why he 
works day and night to prevent such a thing. 


This is why the Jew MUST control our communications; this 
is why he MUST control our education; this is why he MUST 
control our government; and most important, this is why he 
MUST control our religion. If he fails to do this, in any area, 
he endangers his continued existence as a biological parasite. 
Even in the Soviet Union, with its idealistic slogan of "From 
each according to his means; to each according to his needs," 
the parasite gains control over gentile workers and sets them 
to producing goods which he sells, and pockets the proceeds. 
Fat Jews and their blond mistresses stroll from their luxurious 
villas on the Black Sea, while intense, dogmatic gentile com- 
missars such as Mikhail Suslov sit in the Kremlin trying des- 
perately to devise a system which the Jew cannot twist to his 
own advantage. They cannot succeed, because the parasite has 
always thought one step ahead of them. 


When the Jews seized the lands of peaceful Arab farmers by 



aggression in 1948, many gentiles throughout the world sup- 
posed that a new era had begun. These gentiles assured each 
other, now that they have their own country, the Jews will go 
there and stop exploiting us. Instead, the parasitic communities 
in all parts of the world intensified their exploitations of their 
gentile hosts, in order to meet the vast needs of the new State 
of Israel. Garment workers in the notorious New York sweat 
shops, most of them Negro and Puerto Rican women and chil- 
dren, had large portions of their earnings extorted from them 
by the cold-blooded Jew, David Dubinsky, the fascist dictator 
of the garment union. These funds were turned over to the 
State of Israel. 

This illustrates the facility of the Jew for being on all sides, 
and for always being on the winning side. Chaim Weizmann, 
the founder of the State of Israel, quotes an oft-repeated say- 
ing of his mother, in his autobiography, "Trial and Error", 
Harper, New York, 1949, page 13, 

"Whatever happens, I shall be well off. If Shemuel (the re- 
volutionary son) is right, we shall all be happy in Russia; and 
if Chaim (the Zionist) is right, then I shall go to live in 


On April 17, 1950, the New York Times announced that the 
annual budget of the State of Israel had been released. It was 
composed of seventy per cent, of donations from abroad, and 
thirty per cent, from the sale of Israeli bonds, which would 
never have any redeemable value, and which could only be 
described as contributions. No other nation on earth could en- 
vision such a budget, for even India, the perennial beggar 
among nations, with its swollen, mongrelized population, can 
raise only one per cent, of its budget from abroad, and that 
is entirely donated by the United States. Yet the State of 
Israel confidently envisions a national budget for years to 
come consisting of charity and the peddling of dubious paper. 
This is the budget of a nation of parasites, still depending upon 
the gentile hosts. 


The bizarre, unhealthy existence of the parasite, with his 



trend to degeneracy and his decaying nervous system, places 
him outside of every known system of morality and human de- 
cency. Now he has perfected a Jewish hellbomb, which 
threatens to destroy the host and himself as well. When Alech- 
sander Sachs, of the international Jewish banking firm of Leh- 
man Brothers, New York, and Albert Einstein, "suggested" to 
President Roosevelt that he invest hundreds of millions of dol- 
lars in the production of a hellbomb, how could Roosevelt re- 
fuse? Now they needed a gentile front for their project. Major 
General Leslie Groves was asked to head the project, but 
when he found that most of the scientists were Jewish, he 
asked to be excused, saying that he believed that a Jewish 
director would be more efficient in this atmosphere. 

"Not at all," he was assured. "We need a gentile as the os- 
tensible head of the project. Don't worry, we'll handle all of 
the responsibility." 

We know that the gentile can never expect any mercy from 
the Jew. The horrible practice of ritual murder is sufficient 
evidence of this. The ritual murder of gentile children by 
bleeding them to death and drinking their blood is the highest 
symbolic revelation of the theory of the biological parasite. 


Primitive man sometimes drank the blood of fallen foes as 
a symbol of victory, and to absorb some of the strength of the 
enemy, but another blood-drinking practice, that of ritual mur- 
der, is the only one which has survived into modern times. This 
religious ceremony of drinking the blood of an innocent gentile 
child is basic to the Jew's entire concept of his existence as a 
parasite, living off of the blood of the host. That is why he 
refuses to abandon this custom, even though it has brought 
him close to extinction many times. 

When the Jew can no longer symbolize his role by kidnapping 
a perfectly formed gentile child, spiriting him away to a syna- 
gogue, and ritually puncturing his body in the places which 
they boasted they had wounded the Body of Christ, and drink- 
ing the blood of the dying child, then, according to Jewish 
belief, he is doomed. His prophets have warned him that when 
this custom can no longer be observed, the Jewish parasite's 



hold onto the host will be loosened, and he will be cast off. 
Even though this ceremony is so horrible that most Jews 
refuse to participate in it, and all of them deny its practice, 
it still remains the final method by which the Jewish leaders 
signify and retain their control over this people. Should they 
abandon the practice of ritual murder, perhaps there would be 
a possibility that the Jew could be weaned away from his his- 
torical role as a biological parasite, and become a constructive 
member of the gentile community, turning his back upon a 
record of five thousand years of bloodshed, treachery and 
murder, which is his entire history. We say perhaps, because 
we do not know. 


Viewing this prospect from the biological realities, it seems 
unlikely that the Jew could renounce his past and join gentile 
society as a contributing member. Certainly we find no evi- 
dence of it in the writings of the Jews themselves, even at the 
present time. From the most religious of them to the most 
worldly, their attitude towards the gentile host is the same, 
a fierce, undying hatred. Consider what the high priestess of 
the modern Jewish intellectuals, Susan Sontag, has to say 
in the Jewish house organ, the Partisan Review, in 1967: 

"The white race is the cancer of history. It is the white race 
and it alone — its ideologies and inventions — which eradicates 
autonomous civilization wherever it spreads. " 

These twenty-seven words capsule an enormous amount of 
information about the parasite-host relationship. First, it is an 
expression of the undying hatred which the parasite bears for 
its white race host. Second, it reveals that the Jew has never 
and will never consider himself as part of the white race, which 
it regards as a separate species. Third, this passage attributes 
savagery only to the white race — not to the bloodthirsty tribes 
of the Congo, not to the mass murders in China, nor to anyone 
except the highly developed North European civilization in 
Europe and America. And fourth, Susan Sontag reveals the en- 
tire situation in her phrase "autonomous civilization". What 
does she mean by autonomous civilization? She means the 
parasite community, which demands total freedom to attach it- 



self to the host, to rule the host, and to prevent the host from 
casting it off. And she says here that the white race, because 
in the past it has reacted against the "autonomous civilization" 
of the Jewish parasite, is totally savage and evil. 




We have remarked on the strange omission of works which 
one might expect in our libraries, works which treat of the 
phenomenon of parasitic communities in human civilizations. 
And we have suggested that these works have not been writ- 
ten because the parasite exercises control over the academic 
and scholarly life of the host. Is this a fantastic conclusion? 
Not at all. Since the host is physically stronger than the para- 
site, obviously the parasite cannot control him through physical 
strength. Then he must exercise mental control. How is this 
done? The Jewish parasite controls the gentile host through 
an entire class of gentiles which he has created, and who 
serve him by maintaining control over the gentile host. This 
class is known as the shabez goi. 


We have pointed out that the Jewish parasite is a disease of 
the more advanced civilizations. One does not find the Jew 
sharing the hostile desert with the Australian aborigine. Prim- 
itive man had no experience of parasites. There was little food 
and less shelter. But those who survived began to master their 
environment, to till the land, to domesticate animals, and 
there began to be surpluses of food. Now rats and cockroaches 
appeared, feasting on these surpluses (one of the heroes of the 
Jewish intellectual movement, Franz Kafka, wrote a work in 
which a man envisioned himself as a cockroach, writing out 
of some ancient racial memory which has bemused thousands 
of university students who had it rammed down their throats 



by their professors, with no explanation of its overtones). 

With these surpluses, there also appeared a new type of 
person, a variant of the species, one who existed by producing 
no goods or services, but who became adept at producing an 
illusion that he was giving goods and services. This was the 
Jew, who made his appearance upon the stage of history as a 
magician, a fortune-teller, a petty thief, or, in the open coun- 
try, a treacherous and cold-blooded bandit. He became a 
physician, a teacher, an acolyte in any kind of religious group. 
From earliest history, he practiced money-lending, and always 
at usurious rates of interest. 

All of these Jewish vocations have one thing in common, 
the opportunity for fraud. The Jew always operated from a 
basis of fraud, and slipped eerily from one vocation into an- 
other. A Jew practices medicine in one city, and, leaving be- 
hind a trail of corpses, turns up in another town as a sooth- 
sayer. After some widows are bilked of their life savings, he 
again takes to the road, assisted, as always, by the internation- 
al Jewish community. In another town, he becomes a student 
priest, and soon he offers daring new interpretations of the 
religious beliefs, until his superiors find that he is stealthily 
transforming every tenet of their faith into some strange and 
barbaric dogma. He moves on, and turns up in another city as 
a highly trusted government official, respected by all, until, 
one evening, the gates of the city are opened to an invader, 
and the Jew becomes the Grand Vizier of the conquerors. 


But is this parasitism, or is it merely crime? It is crime, yes, 
for each of these isolated events is a crime, but the whole is 
not merely crime, it is parasitism. Treason, fraud, perversion, 
all the hallmarks of Jewish life among the gentiles in the 
Diaspora. And it is parasitism. All of these things are not mere- 
ly crimes in themselves, they are crimes which are committed 
as essential parts of the Jew's parasitical relationship with the 
gentile host. We must remember that there is no Jewish crime 
per se, since the existence of the Jewish parasite upon the host 
is a crime against nature, because its existence imperils the 
health and the life of the host. Thus, everything that the Jew 



does in connection with this parasitic existence is a criminal 
act, and part of an overall criminal existence. 


A gentile government which had as its concern the health 
of the nation would convict the Jewish parasite and cast him 
off. This has happened hundreds of times in recorded his- 
tory. Therefore, the Jew knows that his first task, upon arriv- 
ing in a gentile community, is to subvert and take over its 
government, and to paralyse the people with subtle injections 
of poison, so that they become helpless and unable to defend 
themselves. Thus, the Jew begins agitation to set up a "pro- 
gressive" government, also known as a "popular front", a 
"democratic" government, a "people's" government, a "liberal" 
government, and all of these are synonyms for the Jewish 
government, which will protect the presence of the parasite 
and guard it against the anger of the exploited gentiles. 

When he has set up this government, usually by subversion, 
the Jew sets out to exterminate all of the former gentile lead- 
ers, whom he reviles as "reactionaries", that is, those who might 
react against the presence of the parasite. First, they are pre- 
vented from engaging in any gainful employment. Then they 
and all members of their families have their landholdings, 
bank accounts and other assets confiscated. Finally, after 
extensive agitation against them, the Jew arouses the populace 
against them and they are hunted down and killed, because 
they might be able to set up a "reactionary" government if 
they are allowed to survive. Thus the Jew has introduced the 
blood-thirsty custom of genocide, or extermination of groups, 
into world affairs. 

Now, does not this sound familiar, the confiscation of as- 
sets, the mass murders? Oh, yes, Russia, 1917, the victory of 
the Bolsheviks, the carrying out of Marx's program of Com- 
munism, when a government which believed in the principle 
of "solidarity" was installed to enslave the gentile Russian peo- 
ple. The Czar and his wife and children were murdered in cold 
blood, because the biological Jew is not concerned with chi- 
valry in his struggle to maintain control over the gentile host. 
We have only to read the sadistic Book of Esther in the Bible 



to see the Jewish custom of mass murder exposed in detail. 


Is the helplessness of the gentile host before the onslaught 
of the parasite an essential weakness? We have only to think 
of the strong, healthy man subdued by a flu virus to get the 
answer. Health in all matters is the principal defense against 
the attack of the parasitic virus. For centuries, the larger and 
stronger gentile host has gone down in defeat before the 
smaller and weaker, but more deadly, parasitic virus. The sur- 
vival of the gentile host is a matter of understanding biological 
laws. The gentile community has set up elaborate codes by 
which it lives, codes of honor, codes of laws, and the trust 
which the observance of these codes breeds in the members 
of the community. They respect the law, they respect each 
other's families, they respect each other's property, and they 
defend the nation when it is attacked. 


It is the code of honor which gives the Jewish parasite his 
first opening in the armor of the gentile host, since this code 
is binding upon the gentile host, and its members achieve 
status in the community only if they observe it. But the para- 
site is bound only by his determination to achieve parasitic 
status upon the host. The gentile's code is itself a biological 
phenomenon, since it grows out of his attitude towards all 
life, and it is a manifestation of his innate courage, his honor 
and his industry, the virtues upon which he builds his nation. 

The code of the Jew is quite different. It is a code which 
abnegates all other codes. He agrees to pay one price and later 
settles only half of it; he appears in court with forged deeds 
and wills, paid perjured witnesses, and kept judges, thus taking 
over gentile properties. He takes advantage of the gentile 
wives while their husbands are at work, thus shaming them, 
and in time of war, the Jew avoids army service and disrupts 
civilian life at home. At the times of gravest peril, he makes 
deals with the enemy and betrays the nation. 


Since the parasite depends upon the host for its food, we 



would suppose that it would do everything within its power to 
aid the gentile community to become richer and more power- 
ful. But, overriding every other consideration is the parasite's 
determination to keep its position upon the host. For five 
thousand years, history has recorded the efforts of gentile hosts 
to dislodge their Jewish parasites. Empires rise and fall, con- 
tinents are discovered, wildernesses are explored and settled, 
and man makes progress through new inventions. Yet through 
it all, one factor remains constant. The gentile host, fearful 
of the damage which it is suffering from the presence of the 
Jewish parasite, tries to dislodge it. The parasite has prepared 
for such efforts, which it always foresees, by attaching itself 
so securely to the host that the host only damages itself in 
its wild struggles. In some cases, the gentile host destroys it- 
self in these efforts. The Jewish host prefers seeing the gentile 
host destroyed instead of leaving peaceably from a still-living 
host. If the host dies, the parasite looks for another host. It 
has no feeling of any kind for the host which has provided 
it with food. This callous attitude is typical of the philosophy 
of the Jew, and it is exemplified by the current phrase so 
popular in Jewish Hollywood, "Who needs it?" 

Like other Jewish sayings, this phrase has become part of 
contemporary American life, yet gentiles do not know what 
it means. It means that the Jew doesn't need the gentile host, 
because he can always find another one. 


Millions of gentile Americans work hard all of their lives, 
raising their families and feeding themselves. When they die, 
there is hardly enough left to pay the funeral costs. Despite 
the fact that they have lived useful and productive lives, none 
of the profits have accrued to them or to their families, they 
have been unable to accumulate any of the world's goods. 
Yet millions of Jews, who produce nothing, accumulate vast 
fortunes, and die with a disproportionate share of the nation's 
wealth, which then goes to the parasite community. Why is 
this? Is it because the gentile worker is lazy? No, he has work- 
ed hard all of his life. Did he gamble away his earnings? No, 
he has never gambled. It is the Jews who make up the ma- 



jority of the nations gamblers. 


We find the answer to this question in the theory of bio- 
logical parasitism. The gentile worker has spent his life in 
providing sustenance for the Jewish parasite, enabling the 
parasite to live in luxury while the gentile worker labors long 
hours each day in order to survive on a mere subsistence level. 
The earnings of the gentile worker vanish before his eyes into 
the Jewish monetary system, as calculated and abstruse mone- 
tary laws go into effect. Meanwhile, the Jewish educational 
system instructs the gentile worker's children that they can 
look forward to the privilege of laboring all of their life to 
support the Chosen People of God, who live in the style to 
which they have become accustomed. 

The Jewish monetary system is a series of variations on the 
shell game at the county fair. The gentile is certain that the 
pea is under the shell on the left, but when he bets on it, 
the shell on the left has nothing under it. The gentile puts his 
money down on other Jewish peas, but whatever he buys sud- 
denly depreciates. The bonds which he purchases drop in 
value, and he sells at a loss, in order to avoid losing everything 
he has. 

Many people emigrated to America because the Rothschilds 
had suddenly risen to power in Europe, and were now looting 
the continent. As these gentiles fled, the greedy Jewish para- 
sites inflicted heavier taxes on those who remained, conscripted 
the youths into armies which were leased for hire to other na- 
tions, and invaded every level of life with their pernicious 

Now, a feature of the parasite is his mobility. When the host 
moves, the parasite follows, catches up with him, and re- 
establishes his attachment. The American pioneers resented 
the efforts of the parasites to follow them, and one of the 
longest debates at the Continental Congress concerned a pro- 
posal for permanent exclusion of the Jews. It was finally de- 
feated by the curious argument that, as the Jews were not 
presently a problem, they would be unlikely to become so in 
the future. This certainly went against the grain of everything 
that was known about the Jews and their methods. 




The records of these debates have survived only in a few 
notes taken by some of the delegates. The drafts of the Con- 
stitution which contains the proposal for Jewish exclusion have 
all been destroyed. One of the Jewish vocations is that of 
dealer in old books and rare documents. In these dealings, 
records containing unfavorable references to the past can be 
sequestered and destroyed. Other rare documents, which con- 
tain no unfavorable references to the Jews, are sold to gentile 
collectors at huge profits. As usual, the Jew has it both ways, 
protecting his flanks by destroying all references to his ac- 
tivities, and financing this task with the gentile's money. 


What is the function of government? The function of govern- 
ment is to provide the people with essential services, to guide 
the defense of the nation, and to promote justice and free en- 
terprise. Now, what is the function of a gentile government 
which has come under the direction of the parasite? The chief 
function of a government controlled by the parasite is to guar- 
antee his right to feed upon the host, to protect him against 
being cast out, and to allow other parasites the right to come 
in and feed upon the host. Thus, the chief function of such a 
government is bound up with campaigns for civil rights for 
minorities, liberalizing all immigration laws, and attacking 
other hosts who threaten to cast off their parasites. All other 
considerations of government are swept aside in the per- 
forming of these functions, which are so essential to the well- 
being of the parasite. 

Thus, in the United States, we find the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation ignoring the mounting crime rate while its agents 
spend all of their time in battling those gentile "reactionaries" 
who are reacting against the harmful presence of the parasite. 
We find that the American government has become a vast tax- 
collecting agency for the benefit of the parasites, and that 
eighty-four per cent, of the gentiles' earnings are forcibly taken 
from them and given to the parasites. We find that every 
department of the government has interested itself in the 



added function of guaranteeing the parasite's continued secur- 
ity in its position upon the host. They have set up many new 
economic subsidiaries whose task is to funnel all of the nation's 
economic resources into the hands of the parasites. We find 
that the Department of Defense, instead of guarding our na- 
tion, is punishing the nation with a tremendous blood-letting 
by sending many thousands of our finest youth to be slaughter- 
ed in jungles many thousands of miles from our shores, in wars 
which the Jewish parasites have conjured up for this sole 


Instead of providing equal justice for all, the courts of the 
nation have become rubber stamp Star Chambers for the per- 
secution of those gentiles who react to the presence of the 
parasite. These gentile "reactionaries" are arrested on some 
pretext or other, or evidence against them is planted by FBI 
agents, and they are sentenced to long terms in prison. 

What about education? We find that the Jewish parasite 
makes a fetish of education. There must be universal educa- 
tion, education for all. But what sort of education does the 
gentile host receive in a state which is dominated by the Jew- 
ish parasite? First, he is taught that he must never think for 
himself, because this is the original sin. He is carefully in- 
structed in how to be a docile slave for the rest of his life, a 
robot-like zombie who will never be able to use his mind for 
his own protection or advancement. 

Why does the Jewish parasite have to control the native 
intelligence of the gentile? First, the Jew is not invisible, he 
has high visibility. He knows that the gentile is bound to 
see him, to become irritated by his presence, and to wish 
to cast him out. The gentile has only to look down the street 
on any Main Street in America to see that most of the busi- 
nesses are owned by Jews. The place where he works is owned 
by a Jew. He pays rent each month, or a lifelong mortgage, to 
a Jewish bank. He knows that he is being mercilessly exploited 
by a foreign body known as the Kingdom of Israel. Therefore, 
the biological parasite begins its instruction of the gentile 
child, even before the alphabet, with the definition of the 



forbidden sin. What is the forbidden sin? One must never 
show "prejudice" towards another human being. The children 
hear this admonition daily from the time they enter kinder- 
garten. They are puzzled by it, because children are naturally 
open and generous, they do not hate anyone. They never real- 
ize that if the teacher fails to give them this daily lesson 
about "prejudice", she will be fired from her job. 


In high school and college, the gentile comes under the 
more forceful influence of Jewish teachers. They find that the 
Jewish teachers are interesting, because they seem to have 
carte blanche to say or do whatever they wish in class, while 
the gentile teachers seem hamstrung in everything they do. 
The Jewish teachers recommend pornographic books to the 
children, discuss sexual perversions in detail, and frequently 
harangue their classes for hours about the evils of Nazism. 
Since there is no Nazi government anywhere, the gentile 
children are puzzled by this. They do not understand the ter- 
rible fear and hatred which fills the Jewish people at the me- 
mory of a gentile people who reacted against them and cast 
them out. 

At home, the gentile child watches television programs 
which are largely devoted to anti-Nazi themes. This is not 
surprising, since the Jewish parasites own outright the three 
television networks, and no program can be seen which is not 
subjected to their warped censorship. In the universities, the 
gentile is taught that all of the world's culture stems from 
the writings of three Jewish parasites, Marx, Freud and Ein- 
stein. Gentile artists and writers are no longer mentioned. 


Ask any American college graduate — "What is the greatest 
evil which has ever existed upon this earth?" He will reply 
very promptly, and energetically, "Nazism!" 

He gives this answer because it is what he has been taught. 
In fact, it is all he has been taught, and it is the sole result of 
four years of higher education. Do not ask him WHY Nazism 



is the greatest evil that has ever been known, because he does 
not know. You will only perplex and confuse him, and make 
him angry at you, because he does not know the WHY of 
anything. He has only been indoctrinated with conditioned 
responses, he is repeating the lesson which has been drummed 
into him until he has learned it by heart, at the hands of his 
Jewish and shabez goi professors. In all of the hundreds of 
books which have been written about Nazism, you will not 
find a definition of what Nazism is. This is quite understand- 
able. The Jews do not want anyone to know what Nazism is. 
Nazism is simply this — a proposal that the German people 
rid themselves of the parasitic Jews. The gentile host dared 
to protest against the continued presence of the parasite, and 
attempted to throw it off. It was an ineffectual reaction, be- 
cause it was emotional and ill-informed, as were all the gentile 
reactions which preceded it for five thousand years. And how 
futile it all was, because today, Jewish bankers own sixty per 
cent, of German industry, and their holdings are protected by 
the occupation army of America. 


Since the parasite is smaller and weaker than the host, he 
must control it principally by guile. And because he is out- 
numbered, he must depend upon active agents among the 
gentiles. Once he has destroyed the host people's native leader- 
ship, he creates a new ruling class, a group recruited from the 
weakest and the most depraved of the gentiles. This class be- 
comes known as "the new class", and it is composed of the 
government officials, the educators, the judges and lawyers, 
and the religious leaders. This "new class" is known to the 
Jew as his shabez goi, or his "Sabbath gentile cattle". 

The creation of the shabez goi class provides that the Jewish 
religion is basically a ritualization of the parasite's techniques 
for controlling the host. A key tenet of the Jewish religion is 
that he must not perform the slightest task on his Sabbath. 
He cannot begin his religious service until the candles are 
lit, but his religion forbids him to light the candles, because 
this would be work. He must find a gentile to light the candle 
for him. This gentile is called a "shabez goi". Thus, the Jewish 
religion cannot be enacted until the Jew finds a gentile to do 



his work for him.* The Jewish religion also forbids the Jew 
to work for a gentile, although it is permitted for short per- 
iods of time if the Jew finds it necessary to take such a position 
during the period he is plotting to steal the gentile's business 
from him! 

Those gentiles who become shabez goi for the Jews lead 
comfortable lives at the expense of their fellows, but they can 
never overcome their shame, regardless of how wealthy and 
powerful the Jews make them. The exploiting class which the 
Jews create from the most servile and contemptible of the 
gentiles are the most despicable human beings who have ever 
infested the earth. Although they comprise the educated and 
moneyed classes in a host nation which has fallen prey to the 
Jewish parasites, the shabez goi wretches never lead happy 
lives. In the United States, we find that the gentile bankers, 
judges, college presidents and leaders of religious denomina- 
tions whose mission is to parrot in Pavlov, trained-dog fashion 
every whim of the Jews, are also the people who have the 
highest rates of alcoholism, the highest rate of divorce, the 
highest rate of suicide, and the highest rate of juvenile de- 
linquency among their children. 


This "affluent society" of the shabez goi also has spawned 
a massive wave of homosexuality and degeneracy in America. 
Is this surprising? We have only to recall Professor LaPage's 
description of the effect which the parasite Sacculina has upon 
its host, the short-tailed spider crab, Inacus mauritanicus. La- 
Page says that his researches showed that seventy per cent, 
of the male spider crabs acquired some of the secondary sexual 
characteristics of the female and had their reproductive or- 
gans destroyed by the attack of Sacculina neglecta. He also 
stated that "the abdomen of these males becomes broad, they 

* Drew Pearson described the process in a column, Washington Post, July 
5, 1968 when he quoted Mayor of San Francisco, Joseph Alioto, a 
Catholic, as follows: 

"I've been raised in the shadow of the synagogue across the street 
from me, and my parish priest has been Rabbi Fine. Every week I light 
a candle in the synagogue, and Cyril Magnin lights a candle in my 

Alioto's political success has been due to his operation as a shabez 
goi, lighting candles for the Jews. 



may acquire, in addition to their male copulating styles, ap- 
pendages modified to bear eggs, and their nippers become 
smaller at the same time." 

What better description could we have of a middle-aged 
college professor simpering in the wake of a brawny football 
player? One of the characteristics of nations which are con- 
trolled by the Jews is the gradual eradication of masculine in- 
fluence and power, and the transfer of influence into feminine 
forms. This is understandable. The masculine force is naturally 
aggressive and self-assertive, independent and self-reliant, 
courageous and willing to fight for its rights. The feminine 
force, on the other hand, is more passive, willing to accept 
orders, and avoids direct action. Thus, Russia and America, 
the two most influential powers in the world today, 
a world which is controlled by the Jewish parasites, are basic- 
ally feminine powers, but the two powers which were more 
masculine in their attributes, Germany and Japan, and which 
did not give power to the Jewish parasites, are small and of 
lesser influence. Nevertheless, as masculine forces, they retain 
the will to again exert force upon the world, while Russia pre- 
fers to use her influence in sinister intrigue, a worldwide net- 
work of agents and assassins, those who stab in the back. Now 
America has followed in Russia's footsteps with the world- 
wide force of the Central Intelligence Agency, and at home, 
the furtive operations of the FBI are aimed solely at con- 
trolling "reactionaries" among this host people. 


In a Jewish-controlled environment, gentile men become 
soft and capable of any treachery, because their new class, 
the shabez goi, are epitomes of the living lie, with their in- 
sidious conspiracies on behalf of the secret government of the 
parasites. In this sort of world, manliness, strength and honor 
are despised. 

The most important feature of the shabez goi wretches, as 
liberal, faceless representatives of Jewish interests is that they 
never solve a problem. If we have a national problem today, 
we can be sure it will be worse ten years from now, and even 
worse twenty-five years hence. All problems intensify, this is 
the basic law of the shabez goi government. 



We have only to look at the race problem in America, as 
a typical illustration. One hundred years ago, we fought a 
bloody war which ravaged much of the nation, in order to 
solve the problem of the Negro minority in America. One 
hundred years later, the nation is on the point of being torn 
apart once more by this problem, as the shabez goi wretches 
have worked ceaselessly since 1900 to intensify this problem, 
which had been dormant from the period of 1870 to 1900. De 
Tocqueville said everything which needed to be said about the 
race problem in America more than a century ago, but no one 
paid him the slightest attention. 


One of the striking points of identification of the shabez goi 
new class is their complete erosion of all sense of responsibility. 
Since the shabez goi life means that they are living for them- 
selves alone, as enemies of their people, it is understandable 
that they should reck little of the future, but it goes further 
than this, as a direct biological result of the effect of the 
Jewish parasite upon the weakest and the shabbiest of the 
host people. Today, the principal group in America which has 
resisted this biological effect is the working class. This is due 
to several factors, first, because the working class has had 
less of the effect of years of "higher education", which, in this 
nation, is simply extended instruction in how to be a shabez 
goi, and second, as workers who produce their own living, 
they have greater self-reliance and less erosion of their sense 
of responsibility and self-respect. 

Although I have passed beyond any possible deleterious ef- 
fect which the Jewish parasite or the shabez goi could have 
upon me, I know the hopelessness of the life of my people. 
I was freed from this paralysis, which the Jew inflicts upon 
the healthy members of a host nation, in two ways, first, 
through my life in art, and second, through my life in Christ. 


In 1948, when I went to San Miguel de Allende, a beautiful 
village in Mexico, I began to live my life in art. At the age of 
twenty-five, this was my first experience of joy, because my 
life had been passed in the gloom which the pall of the Jewish 



parasite had cast over America. I began to understand what 
D. H. Lawrence had experienced during his years of desperate 
wanderings in search of the sun and seeking a healthy life. 
Not only was D.H. Lawrence dying of tuberculosis, but he was 
also dying of the terrible malaise which had settled over 
European civilization, the loss of the will to live, which had 
been eroded away by centuries of slavery under the Jews and 
misgovernment by the shabez goi. 

In the bright, sun-washed streets of San Miguel de Allende, 
for the first time, I knew what light was. The people, though 
poor, were strong and self-reliant, they bore no resemblance 
to the Americans I had left at home. Although I did not realize 
it at the time, there were no Jews here, and no shabez goi. 
Now I began to know the joy of the creative life, my life in 
art, the life of the mind and the God-given talents to which 
all of us are born and of which we are robbed by the Jews 
and the shabez goi. 

Now, there was nothing selfish in my attaining this joy, 
because I was not taking it from anyone else, and since that 
time, I have wished for nothing more than to bring this joy 
to all of my people. Since this desire now became the prin- 
cipal direction of my life, I began to live my life in Christ, 
because I wished to bring joy to others. As these efforts 
brought me nothing but poverty and what would have been 
despair, had I ever despaired, I found Christ and knew a 
greater joy than my life in art. 

If the American people knew nothing of the joy of my life 
in art, how much less did they know of the joy of my life in 
Christ! The question now was, how to liberate them from two 
thousand years of mental serfdom. During these centuries, 
the Jews had continually decried the institution of physical 
slavery, and while noising about the possibility of physical 
freedom for everyone, they had subtly imposed their own 
brand of mental serfdom upon the gentiles. And if physical 
slavery is a crime, how much greater a crime is mental slavery, 
the taking over the mind of a free-born human being! 

One of the greatest problems which faces our nation today is 
the disenfranchisement of the American worker and the mid- 
dle class. His vote is meaningless, it is worthless, because, no 
matter whom he votes for, his personal position in life deterio- 



rates. His taxes are increased, the business pressures intensify, 
and his family life is subjected to terror and shame at the hands 
of aggressive minorities, egged on by the shabez goi wretches 
and the Jewish overlords. 

With the shabez goi in charge of the departments of our 
religious life, our academic life, and our cultural life, the 
American workers and the middle class find that wherever 
they turn, they are faced with the Jew. A Jew directs the 
symphony orchestra, ninety per cent, of the art galleries are 
operated by Jews, so that gentile artists cannot get a showing 
for their work unless they embrace the degenerate goals of 
the Jew. The three television networks are owned and operated 
by Jews, while the studios, producers, and writers, who are 
nearly all Jews, bring us programs in which gentiles caper 
to the Jewish tune. In fact, a five per cent, minority has gained 
control of every aspect of American life. 


Now, this unconscious realization causes the American 
worker and the middle class to become despondent, because 
of a deep feeling of alienation, an overwhelming sense of loss. 
He knows that this is not his art, it is not his culture, it is not 
his religion, and it is no longer his country, because an alien 
has taken over every department of his life. As a result the 
American worker and the member of the middle class loses his 
power of concentration, he can no longer think anything 
through, because his education, his cultural life, and his gov- 
ernment, are all in the hands of the alien, and because he 
cannot think his problems through, he loses the resolve to act, 
he sinks into the hopeless attitudes of lifelong mental slavery 
which the parasite has forced upon him. 


But, even though the American worker or the member of 
the middle class has lost his power to think things through, 
and to act from his will, he is still a human being, he can feel. 
Thus, he endures intense mental suffering, because everything 
has been cut out of his life except the task of working to feed 
the Jewish parasite. And even though I have passed beyond 
this suffering, I cannot rest because I know what this suffer- 



ing is doing to the American people. I do not feel this suf- 
fering, because of the joy of my life in art, and the joy of my 
life in Christ, and, knowing this joy, I do not need America, 
and still less do I need a Jewish America. But America is 
a creation of God, and as such, it cannot be abandoned to the 
Jewish parasites, the suffering of the gentile host must be 


Although I live in joy and peace, I know that America must 
be restored to Christ. I would like to free her from her bondage 
to Satan, in the metaphysical sphere, and from her bondage 
to the Jews, in the biological sphere. Although I have been 
freed from suffering through knowing Christ, I know what 
suffering is doing to my people, who have been robbed of 
everything, and who have been converted into mindless robots 
who mechanically perform tasks according to instructions im- 
planted in them by a Jewish programming, and who respond 
to every question with a Jewish answer. 

I resent the fact that my nation and my people have been 
converted into a country of Pavlov-conditioned dogs, and I 
am resolved to see them become men once more. Because 
they are cut off from the creative life, because they are cut 
off from the life of their nation by the Jewish parasite, their 
lives are empty and pointless. 


One of the problems of this Pavlov conditioning is that we 
no longer have heroes. Now, a nation cannot grow in health 
without heroes. For the past fifty years, our heroes have been 
the synthetic products of Jewish liberalism, those Americans 
who have successfully exploited their people for the benefit of 
the Jews, and who have expedited the mongrelization of the 
American people. These synthetic heroes are made of plastic, 
they do not have any of the human qualities. A typical syn- 
thetic hero is Hubert Humphrey, Vice-President of the United 
States, whom one can press into any shape, like a rubber doll, 
because he has no skeletal structure. He has accepted every 



aspect of the shabez goi role, and he has no culture and no 
goals except those which have been implanted in him by the 
Jewish programmers. 


In 1957, alarmed by the issuance of a report known as the 
Gaither Report, which insisted that every aspect of shabez 
goi life and Jewish liberalism must be intensified in America, 
some of my associates urged me to make a formal reply. As 
this request dovetailed with some projects on which I was 
then engaged, I was able to draw up a sweeping reply within 
a few weeks. This report is reproduced here exactly as it was 
published in August, 1957, by M & N Associates, in Chicago, 

(Due to public alarm over the Gaither Report, which admits 
that the United States is rapidly becoming a second-class 
power, but dares not admit why that is inevitable, M&N Asso- 
ciates has decided to release the confidential Mullins Report, 
prepared in August, 1957 for a group of American industrial- 
ists. We issue this report as a public service by an impartial 
research organization. It has already become history.) 
DOES INDIA TODAY. The United States will then be an 
overpopulated, impoverished country with a standard of living 
50 per cent, below its 1957 level. 

Consequently, there is no need, and little possibility, of Russia 
waging war against the United States. The rapid wane of the 
United States as a global power will enable Russia to make 
the American continents into Communist satellites by 1980, if 
she so chooses, but this prospect is unlikely. From geopolitical 
considerations, the continents of North and South America will 
be of little practical use to Russia. Her European and Asian 
policies will remain paramount to her national security, but 
the American continents will be of less geopolitical significance 
than Africa. 

Because of this prospect, the Rockefeller Report and other 
government demands for increased "defense" spending may 
be properly evaluated as last-gasp attempts to shore up an ar- 



tificial and doomed prosperity. How did it happen that the 
United States, which in 1945 stood unchallenged as the su- 
preme world power, could decline so rapidly? To understand 
this, a brief review of the nation's history is necessary. The 
country was settled by bold, energetic North Europeans who 
were willing to risk their lives in a wilderness in order to own 
their own homes and land. Cheap labor was needed, but the 
Indians refused to become menials, so they were killed or put 
on reservations. The New Englanders imported negroes, but 
they proved to be less productive than the cost of their keep, 
so they were sold to Southern plantation owners, where the 
climate was more suitable and their owners less demanding. 
Even so, their importation was soon discontinued as imprac- 

Meanwhile, the original North European settlers prospered 
and increased. With ample space and plenty of natural re- 
sources, they soon developed into the most highly skilled and 
productive people the world has ever known. New inventions 
poured from them, and they enjoyed the greatest prosperity 
in the history of mankind. 

Successive waves of cheap labor came from Europe. A sub- 
stantial wave from Ireland produced many desirable citizens, 
but after 1860 little further immigration came from Northern 
Europe. Most of it was from Central and South Europe, with 
some Asiatics. Side by side with the North European settlers 
lived the burgeoning families of the darker citizens. Limited 
in number in their own lands because of their lower productiv- 
ity, they reproduced in much greater numbers here because of 
the higher productivity of their hosts. 

Despite the fact that these darker citizens enjoyed a higher 
standard of living here, thanks to the superior technology of 
the North Europeans, they felt no gratitude. Instead, they 
were consumed by hatred and envy of the North Europeans, 
many of whom had amassed large fortunes and lived like 
princes. By 1900, the darker American citizens had formed a 
voting bloc to combat the political leadership of the North 
Europeans. Already a deep racial schism had formed which 
doomed the young republic at the very peak of its promise. 
The North Europeans soon concentrated their strength in the 
Republican Party, while the darker citizens became Demo- 



crats, a party which also represented the white Southerners 
as a result of the War Between the States. This strange al- 
liance achieved its first great political victory in 1912 with the 
election of Woodrow Wilson, a misguided idealist who hailed 
the Russian Communist Revolution of 1917 as a "victory for 
democracy over the forces of despotism". Wilson set the nation 
on a suicidal foreign policy caused by the racial schism of its 
people. This policy aimed to end all racial injustice, atone for 
the sins of British imperialism, reprimand French imperialism, 
stop German imperialism, and set up a worldwide protectorate 
for the colored peoples. 

The North European Americans had no idea what this policy 
intended, and were too busy and prosperous to care. The na- 
tion gained in wealth and power by entering the First World 
War. A few years later, the Crash of 1929 wiped out the 
fortunes and property of more than half of the North European 
Americans. The stage was set for the Roosevelt regime, which 
was to set up the rule of the darker citizens over the impover- 
ished and dispirited white Americans, a rule carried on by the 
Truman and Eisenhower directorates. 

Our entry into the Second World War was intended to stop 
"racist" Germany, as though every group in the world was not 
"racist" and interested in its self-aggrandizement. In 1945, a 
victorious United States reaffirmed its role as the protector of 
the colored world. But Soviet Russia also claimed to be the 
protector of the colored world, and pointed out that white 
Americans refused to intermarry with the darker citizens. Most 
white Americans maintained homogenous communities, schools, 
clubs and places of worship, just as did all other groups in the 
United States. However, the heirs of the Roosevelt regime now 
ruled it illegal for white Americans to separate themselves, 
although all other groups were allowed to do so without hind- 
rance by the government. Now the government began to en- 
force a policy of racial amalgamation, although no other na- 
tion in the world, especially Soviet Russia, followed such a 
policy. Largely through the Supreme Court, an instrument 
operating upon powers usurped from Congress, white Amer- 
icans were stripped of their private institutions and forced into 
racially integrated schools and living quarters. Intermarriage 



was inevitable, particularly because of the flood of "integra- 
tion " propaganda. 

All religious groups in the United States declared it a religious 
duty to racially amalgamate, although not one of their leaders 
could cite a single tenet of dogma which required this. White 
children were taught in the schools and churches that it was 
their duty to intermarry with the darker citizens, and the 
press, radio, television and movies pressed the mongrelization 
campaign. The government continued legal action against the 
last privacies of white citizens, although no action was taken 
against Negro, Jewish or other group institutions. Yet at the 
very moment that white Americans were being forced to 
racially amalgamate, their technical skills were in greater de- 
mand than ever before! Guided missiles were being developed 
by imported German scientists because impoverished white 
Americans were working as manual laborers, unable to educate 
their children in technical schools. But the shortage of en- 
gineers was laid to the fact that we had not availed ourselves 
of our fine negro talents; a people who squatted in dusty 
jungle kraals for 20,000 years without the least improvement 
in their conditions was now declared the rightful heirs of the 
American technology! Our universities were flooded with co- 
lored students, their tuition paid by government grants and 
"racist" foundations for colored only. The white Americans 
who could have salvaged our declining technology continued 
as manual laborers. 

All of this was inevitable. The American of North European 
descent, although realizing that he possessed superior skills, 
bore no ill-will towards the darker citizens. But the colored 
man could not see a white man without hating him, for the 
white face reminded the colored man that he was dark. Either 
the colored man must become lighter or the white man must 
become darker. No other remedy would pacify him. Anyone 
who has seen the advertisements for "skin whiteners" in the 
negro press knows how basic this drive is among the dark 
people. The pivotal negro vote caused the white man to be 
legislated out of existence in the nation which he had created, 
and the Supreme Court declared, "All Americans are Negroes! " 
M&N Associates makes no comment on the justice or injus- 
tice of this development. We only evaluate the facts. The in- 



evitable result was that by destroying the white American's 
desire to preserve himself as a manifestation of God's Holy 
Will, and forcing him to intermarry with the colored, the na- 
tion was condemned to go the way of other great world 
powers, India, Egypt, Greece and Rome, whose white leader- 
ship vanished in intermarriage with darker peoples. 
The passing of a great nation from the stage of world history 
is neither an occasion for sadness or rejoicing. It is simply an 
historical event. The process was hound to be much more rapid 
in the United States because of the pace of modern life and 
the tremendous pressure behind the dark people's will to 
intermarry with the whites. At the same time, Soviet Russia's 
white managerial elite, showing no intention of intermarrying 
with darker peoples, continued to specialize. Selective breed- 
ing became a state policy, and thus Russia secured the future 
for herself, for the future was long since known to belong to 
that nation which could produce the highest type of technolog- 
ical elite. 

At this late stage, M&N Associates was asked to ascertain 
whether the colored citizens could be restrained in their ag- 
gression against white Americans. The answer is no. They will 
never he content to enjoy their higher standard of living here, 
because it cannot compensate for their constant reminders to 
themselves that they are inferiors. Once again, bolder whites 
will emigrate, this time to Australia and New Zealand. At best, 
the United States may become a sort of British Guiana, a 
colored colony of white Canada, whose dollar is already worth 
more than ours! 

It is too late for the North European stock, a minority of 
50,000,000, to reassert leadership over 120,000,000 mixed 
bloods. The colored cannot be appealed to on patriotic 
grounds, for they can never know nation-feeling, but only 
have race. Only a people capable of defending their land can 
know patriotism. Typical was A. Philip Randolph's advice to 
negroes to refuse to serve in the U. S. Army. M&N Associates 
does not believe that a White movement can gain power. There 
is no longer a White market in the U. S., either commercially 
or politically. At best, the whites might secede again as a 
white Southern republic, leaving the mulatto North to go its 
own way, but the result would be the same, the disappearance 



of the United States as a world power. Our mulatto grand- 
children will placidly watch the decay of the nation they in- 
herited, while the rest of the world, including Soviet Russia, 
pay no more attention to us than is presently paid to the 
mouthings of the mulatto inhabitants of India. The world is 


When this report was drawn up more than a decade ago, I 
said that it was already history. Since then, the American posi- 
tion has worsened on the precise lines which I laid down. I said 
there was no white market, and every American politician since 
then has borne me out. In only one point did I err; I failed to 
allow for the possible reclamation of America through knowing 
Christ, because at that time I had not progressed this far, I 
did not foresee this sole possibility of reclamation for America. 

Some of the sponsors of this report felt that it was unduly 
pessimistic. Yet, in less than a decade, many of our great cities, 
including the nation's capital, lay in ashes, while we had enter- 
ed an economic crisis which seemed impossible to solve. Now, 
even the Mullins Report did not predict national bankruptcy 
against a background of burned and looted cities, in less than 
ten years! Who will dare to be sufficiently pessimistic about 
the next ten years? 

Let us recapitulate how this all came about. In 1945, the 
United States stood alone as the supreme military power in 
the world, the only industrial nation whose plants had not 
been destroyed by the Second World War. Militarily and eco- 
nomically, America was the master of the world, and the world 
waited for our command. We had only to raise our hand, and 
our command would be obeyed. England, France, Italy, Rus- 
sia, and Germany, and in Asia, Japan, lay in ruins, their fac- 
tories but heaps of rubble. 


But we gave no command. Why? Because the parasites and 
their shabez goi wretches had but one desire, to rebuild Com- 
munist Russia. Dean Acheson proposed that vast new loans be 



made to Russia, through his law firm, Covington and Burling, 
which so ably represented nine Communist nations at our 
Federal trough. The American postwar economy was ham- 
strung by Communist Jews such as David Niles, a notorious 
homosexual who bragged that Harry Truman never made a 
decision without consulting him, and who had one sister in 
Israeli Intelligence in Tel Aviv, and another sister high in the 
Soviet Intelligence in Moscow. Harry Dexter White, a Lithu- 
anian Jew and lifelong Communist agent, also supervised Tru- 
man's decisions as President of the United States. 

At the top of this heap of worms squirmed the master para- 
site, Bernard Baruch, an agile Jewish speculator who made 
as much as one million dollars a day through foreknowledge 
of government decisions which affected the stock market. No 
wonder Harry Truman called Bernard Baruch "the greatest liv- 
ing American"! This master parasite pulled the strings of a 
horde of conniving political wretches, and collected United 
States Senators as a lesser man might net a cageful of hams- 
ters. He publicly boasted that he had such Senators as Harry 
Byrd, James Byrnes, Harry Truman and many others in his 


Now America's conversion to a peacetime economy was 
held up by these Jews, in order to give Russia precious time 
to rebuild her shattered economy. Not only was the United 
States paralyzed by Jewish "economic planners", whose sole 
aim was to stall the erection of a prosperous economy, but 
the Communists also found the ideal instrument with which 
to weaken America from within, a planned race war. With 
the race war and the paralyzed economy in America, the 
Communists bought time, a precious decade, time for Russia 
to build an atomic bomb, with the assistance of the Rosen- 
bergs and a vast horde of Jewish spies, while other agents 
threw the Negro masses against the barricades in a reckless 
and destructive race war. Now the government of the United 
States practically ceased to function, as the "spontaneous" and 
carefully-rehearsed "demand" of the Negro people for their 
"civil rights" took precedence over everything else in Wash- 



ington. The shabez goi wretches leaped into the fray on the 
side of the Negroes, yelping with precise responses to every 
command of the Jewish parasites, their paws flailing the air 
as they slavered for their slice of raw steak, whenever the 
Jews called out "civil rights" or "peace". 


As the high priests of the shabez goi wretches, the Supreme 
Court gave official status to every demand of the Communist- 
inspired mobs in 1954, when it ruled that all schools must 
be integrated. No other single decision of the Supreme Court 
has ever plunged the nation into such chaos. Americans stood 
appalled as armies of American soldiers marched into Ameri- 
can cities, bayoneting and shooting white citizens who tried 
to claim their rights. But, a decade later, when we saw Ameri- 
can soldiers again marching into American cities, it was to 
protect the Negro mobs who were looting and burning with 

Now, in 1945, as we have mentioned, the United States 
stood pre-eminent in the world, as the new Rome. But in 1955, 
Russia was well on her way towards re-establishing herself 
as a world power, while the United States was weaker than 
it had been in 1945! And in 1965, the pendulum had already 
swung in favor of Russia, for in this decade, the Soviet agents 
had successfully implemented a full scale race war in the 
United States, and had also succeeded in committing American 
soldiers to the endless holocaust of an Asiatic land war. 
Caught in a man for man struggle with Asia's teeming bil- 
lions, the United States would slowly bleed to death while 
Russia daily grew stronger, without losing a man. And Rus- 
sia, at home, was calm, while the United States was drawn 
into a race war, the government was paralyzed, the educational 
system was paralyzed, and the American people had not a 
single representative who would defend their interests. 


Jewish gold had purchased the sorriest lot of ragtail beggars 
and thieves that had ever infested our nation's capital, men 
who, while handing over billions to the Jews, had sold them- 
selves for a paltry few thousand dollars apiece! Our Senators 



and Representatives did not even ask for their souls the price 
of a healthy Negro slave at pre-Civil War levels. Once again, 
the Jews had bought a nation with its own money. The Mul- 
lins Report, in placing a dateline of 1980 to see the United 
States reduced to the status of another India, had erred by 
ten years. Now it seems that 1970 is the more likely date. 


Geopoliticians have said for years that America was running 
down. Everything that our nation has achieved had been done 
at the cost of tremendous outpourings of energy and in- 
stinctive intelligence. There has been much native greed and 
cruelty also, the merciless gouging of immigrant workers, the 
mass slaughters of the Civil War and the systematic destruc- 
tion of America's only native culture, the Greek revival gentil- 
ity of the South. These are dark chapters in America's history. 
But there are also bright pages, when America lived up to 
all of her promise of freedom and her offerings of hope to a 
sick and rotted European civilization, which was slowly expir- 
ing because of the excesses committed against her by the Jew- 
ish parasites. And now it is America's turn to totter on the 
brink of the abyss, as her economy reels from the onslaught of 
revolutionary mobs at home and insane Jewish adventures 
abroad. But there are still scientists who are blazing new trails 
for the world, perhaps one per cent, of the nation remains 
constructive in the face of these disasters. 

In 1957, I could not predict the burning of American cities 
while police and National Guardsmen stood by, under orders 
to "show every possible courtesy to the rioters". I could not 
predict that a Jew who had thrice been denied security clear- 
ance would commit large scale American troops to Vietnam in 
order to sabotage our national economy, an effort which was 
advertised as an effort to "stop Communism" while the CIA 
planned the execution of the nation's anti-Communist leader, 
Ngo Diem. No wonder his widow remarked to television news- 
men, "With America as a friend, you don't need any enemies." 


The three hundred billion dollar effort to stop Communism 
in Vietnam would be more believable if it had not been inaug- 



urated by the same lifelong dedicated Marxists in the State 
Department who had sabotaged Chiang Kai-Shek's govern- 
ment and turned China over to the Communists. Can we 
really believe that these traitors, who had presented the Com- 
munist world with a gift of six hundred million people, were 
now prepared to make an all-out effort to save a few Vietna- 
mese from the same fate? They showed their hand by refusing 
Chiang Kai-Shek's offer to send troops to Vietnam, just as 
they had refused his offer to send troops to Korea, because 
the State Department planners had to stick to their plan of 
showing Asia that it was "white imperialists" who were pre- 
venting the Vietnamese from peacefully setting up a Com- 
munist state. If Asians were sent to fight Communism, the 
Marxists in Washington would lose an important plank in their 
program to wreck our nation. 

Meanwhile, at home, as the gross national product reached 
new highs, (due principally to runaway inflation), the Marxists 
continued their mad looting of the United States Treasury. 
Typical was the establishment of more than one hundred 
"think factories" in which the Jewish parasites drew huge 
salaries for sitting around thinking up new ways to exploit the 
gentile host. We find Herman Kahn's Hudson Institute, ex- 
posed in the Nation, May 13, 1968, as having been reviewed 
by the General Accounting Office and its million dollar a year 
contract proved to have produced nothing of value. The Gen- 
eral Accounting Office characterized the work of the Hudson 
Institute as "its ideas a rehash", "superficial", "valueless". The 
Nation noted that "virtually no records were kept either at 
the Hudson Institute or by the General Accounting Office as 
to how money was spent, the progress of programs," and other 
usual business procedures. 

We find that there are some one hundred similar concerns 
in this country, offshoots of the Rand Institute, which spend 
an average of $50,000 per man per year. This is a salary of one 
thousand dollars a week for a Jew to sit in an office puffing 
a cigar, a type of boon-doggle which was inspired by Mortimer 
Adler's twenty million dollar windfall from the Ford Founda- 
tion to "study philosophy", with the usual valueless rehash 
of superficial ideas as the only tangible result. These moneys 
come from tax-exempt foundations or from government agen- 



cies, principally the Department of Defence, and never a 
word of criticism from our Senators and Representatives, who 
dare not criticize this method of the Jewish parasite's exploit- 
ing the gentile host. 


The rapid deterioration of America from a position of 
strength to a rank of second-class power, racked at home by 
riots and bankruptcy, is a classic example of the effect which 
the Jewish parasite has upon the gentile host. Writing in the 
Washington Post on April 5, 1968, Drew Pearson exposed Walt 
Rostow as the man who committed troops on a large scale to 
Vietnam. Rostow is a Jew whose father is an avowed Socialist, 
and Rostow himself, after being refused security clearance 
three times, was placed in charge of our national security! 
The man who refused him security clearance because of his 
background is a loyal American named Otto Otepka, who 
has undergone continuous persecution ever since. State De- 
partment files were destroyed, witnesses were bribed, and 
perjury was committed to prevent Rostow from becoming 
another Dreyfus, a Jew who had gained admittance to the na- 
tion's top security councils and who was now to be rejected 
because of his past. 

Later, as director of our national security, Walt Rostow and 
a little group of high-ranking government Jews gathered in 
the Pentagon early one morning to cheer the Israeli sneak 
attack on its neighbors, and toasted each other while Israeli 
planes massacred American sailors on the U.S.S. Liberty in 
neutral waters! 


The riots which have devastated American cities for three 
years and left entire sections in smoking ruins, remarkably 
akin to the destruction which Jewish-directed bombers had 
visited upon the cities of France and Germany a few years ago, 
had their initial inspiration in the writings of a little black 
hustler in a pamphlet called "The Fire Next Time". It was 
published in a house organ of the Jewish parasites, the New 



Yorker Magazine, and later issued as a book. In this work, 
James Baldwin promised that the Negroes would burn down 
America's cities. Baldwin has long been familiar as a house- 
broken pet of the Jewish parasites, and he lived for two 
decades on the liberal outpourings which they gave him 
from various tax-exempt foundations. Some grants were made 
in return for his favors, others were made to encourage his 
revolutionary activities, but none of these awards could be 
said to have been a sincere appreciation of his feeble literary 
talent. Since the fires started, he has prudently remained in 
Paris, snickering at a series of gay parties on the Left Bank 
while America's cities are devastated by the black mobs who 
consider him their inspiration. In his interviews, which are 
always prominently displayed in the New York Times, he 
refers to the United States as "the Fourth Reich", an "in" 
joke among the parasites. 


If James Baldwin gave an intellectual impetus to the riots, 
the actual planning was done by the Chinese Communists. 
The inside story of the burning of Washington is that the 
Chinese Communists devised a plan whereby the city of 
Washington would become a "free city", divorced from the 
United States and administered by a Black Power Commission. 
This Commission would then charge the United States ten 
million dollars a year rent for the United States Capitol, the 
White House and other government buildings. When Mayor 
Washington approached President Lyndon Johnson with this 
plan, he was told that it was out of the question. A few days 
later, the city of Washington was on fire. The stage had been 
set three days earlier, at a Communist cell meeting at which 
the Party leaders decided upon the death of Dr. Martin Luther 
King. A North Vietnamese professional, Nuy Ti Ganh, was 
flown in for the job, while an American "Oswald" or patsy, 
as his name has now entered the American language, was 
murdered and his body buried that same night. 

At this Communist Party meeting, one of the conspirators, 
a member of Mayor Washington's staff, mentioned that "our 
soul brother, Walter" had guaranteed the safety of looters 



and arsonists during the forthcoming burning of Washington. 
Not a shot would be fired against them — this was the com- 
mitment. The promise was kept. During three days of looting 
and burning Washington, not a single rioter was injured by 
the thousands of police and soldiers who stood by under 
orders not to fire. 

Mayor Washington stated, at the beginning of the riot, that 
any policeman who shot at a rioter would be charged with 
murder. He fought bitterly against the ordering out of the 
National Guard, and permitted it only after extracting the 
incredible commitment from the National Guard commander 
that the troops would keep their weapons unloaded, and that 
they would be permitted to load and fire only after obtaining 
written permission from a superior officer! This was the most 
ridiculous order ever issued to troops going into a combat 
situation! These conditions were then read over Television 
Stations WTOP and WTTG in Washington, so that rioters 
would know they could loot and burn without a shot being 
fired against them. 


At the height of the burning on Friday evening, after the 
Communists had murdered Dr. Martin Luther King according 
to plan, President Lyndon Johnson called Mayor Washington 
and begged him to allow the National Guard to come in. 
Mayor Washington curtly refused, and hung up on him, so 
great was the arrogance of the Negro leader. 

The following afternoon, when most of Washington was in 
flames, Mayor Washington permitted the National Guard 
to come in only to protect the looters, because some of the 
Washington City Police, who had been shot at and clubbed 
by the rioters, were threatening to fight back. The merchants 
cheered the arrival of the National Guard, because they sup- 
posed that this meant a stop to the looting and burning. They 
were dumbfounded to see the soldiers standing by while 
Negroes drove Cadillacs from Newark and Philadelphia up to 
their stores, loaded color televisions, the most expensive cloth- 
ing, and other loot, into the cars, and drove away, while the 
soldiers did nothing to stop them. When the stores had been 



looted, they were set on fire, and again the soldiers did 
nothing. * 


At 3:15 p.m. on Saturday afternoon, Mayor Washington had 
the instructions to the National Guard read over Television 
Stations WTOP and WTTG. He assured the looters that 
"1. The soldiers were carrying unloaded weapons and that 
they would be allowed to load and fire only after being given 
written permission from a superior officer, and 2. that the 
soldiers and police had been ordered to show every possible 
courtesy to the looters." With this reassurance, the rioters step- 
ped up their activity, and the riot spread to Baltimore, where 
the same conditions were in effect. Mayor Washington's in- 
structions resulted in another wild night of looting and burn- 
ing. Five hundred and fifty-eight buildings were burned to 
the ground in the city of Washington after being looted, at 
a cost of eighty million dollars' worth of goods stolen and 
ten million dollars in property damage. As one rioter explain- 
ed, when interviewed by a television cameraman while he 
had his arms filled with hundreds of dollars' worth of expens- 
ive clothing, "Man, it's wonderful! They can't bother us be- 
cause we got a soul brother up there!" 


During the height of the rioting, WTTG newsman Hal 
Walker, a Negro who was allowed to move freely about the 
city during the riots, interviewed a Jewish merchant, John 
Hechinger, who was Chairman of Washington's City Council. 

"Don't you see a pattern to this looting?" asked Walker. 

"Oh, no, it's indiscriminate," replied Hechinger. 

"But aren't only certain types of stores being burned?" 
pursued Walker. 

"No," muttered Hechinger, and the interview was suddenly 
cut off of the air. 

* The Washington Post, July 14, 1968, noted a government investigation 
which had established that the Negroes had been persuaded to burn the 
stores because the Chinese Communists promised them that once the 
Jewish merchants had been burned out, government aid would enable 
Negroes to open businesses in their stead, and that the Jews would be 
afraid to return. 



Hal Walker was referring to the map which had been pre- 
pared before the riot in Washington, on which every Jewish 
store was marked, and of which three hundred copies were 
distributed in the city on the morning before Martin Luther 
King was murdered. The Chinese Communists had persuaded 
the Black Power leaders to stage a massive anti-Semitic up- 
rising against the Jewish merchants who had exploited them. 
The main target of the burning was the destruction of credit 
records, and this goal was achieved. Now Hechinger and other 
Jewish merchants began a frantic campaign to conceal the 
nature of the anti-Jewish uprising. One Washington merchant, 
Irv Weinstein, refused to go along with the coverup, and he 
openly declared that the burning of Washington was the big- 
gest anti-Jewish uprising anywhere in the world since the 
end of World War II. He pointed out that the heinous Krystal 
Nacht in Germany during the Nazi regime, in 1938, in which 
Jewish stores were wrecked, had only resulted in a total of 
one hundred thousand dollars damage, while the Washington 
uprising had cost Jews one hundred MILLION dollars. 


Against the wishes of his fellow Jews, who were desperately 
trying to cover up the story, Irv Weinstein tried to present a 
petition to the United Nations, charging Mayor Washington 
and the City Council with genocide, because they had en- 
couraged the Negroes to attack Jewish stores, and had refused 
the Jews the protection of the City Police and the National 

Ambassador Arthur Goldberg, our representative to the 
United Nations, refused to accept the petition, and assured 
Irv Weinstein that the United States Government would make 
good every dollar lost by the Jewish merchants. When he re- 
turned to Washington, Irv Weinstein was visited by two Black 
Power leaders who told him he had three days to live. Forty- 
eight hours later, he disappeared and has not been heard of 
since. Meanwhile, other Jewish merchants, who reopened their 
stores in Washington, were visited daily by Black Power lead- 
ers who charged them ten per cent, of their gross to stay in 
business, a tactic they had picked up from the Mafia. One 
Jewish liquor dealer who refused them, Ben Brown, was shot 



down in cold blood in his store, and Mayor Washington still 
refused the merchants protection. Meanwhile, other Negroes 
were murdering bus drivers each evening, which caused the 
bus drivers to go on a slowdown. The purpose of these tactics, 
to wreck the economic life of the city and its transportation 
system, had been planned by Chinese Communist leaders in 
order to paralyze the Vietnam peace talks. They correctly rea- 
soned that with our capital city in flames and its economic life 
shattered, we would lose face and would be unable to make 
a strong presentation at the Paris peace talks. The murder of 
Dr. Martin Luther King had been timed for this purpose. 

Meanwhile, agents of the Central Intelligence Agency were 
discovered to have also played a part in fomenting the Wash- 
ington riot. When their role was revealed, CIA officials stated 
that the burned buildings followed exactly a plan for a Wash- 
ington expressway through the city, which had been proposed 
for more than twenty years, but which could not be implement- 
ed because of the cost of acquiring the business buildings and 
tearing them down. Now that they had been burned out, and 
the expressway could be built at a reasonable cost. 


The riots which devastated American cities represented a 
new stage of the mongrelization program which the Jewish 
parasites had devised to weaken the United States, and, if Jews 
such as Irv Weinstein seemed to be the losers in this new 
phase, it was because they refused to look at the long-term 
program which had been devised for America by the Chinese 
Communists and their tools, the Black Power militants. 

This program had been forced upon America during the 
Second World War, when the people were living under martial 
law, and had to accept without protest each new dictatorial 
decree of the Federal Government. At the end of the war, 
the Chinese Communist program moved rapidly to implement 
a forced mongrelization program along three fronts: 

1. Forced integration of all army units, to prevent the ex- 
istence of any armed unit such as an elite white guard which 
could battle against Communism at home. 

2. Forced integration of schools, to educate children from 



their tenderest years to meekly accept government integration 

3. Forced integration of churches, private clubs and neigh- 
borhoods, to prevent any adult white Americans from having 
a place where they could meet to discuss possible reactions 
against the activities of the Jewish parasites. 


During the campaign for forced integration of all American 
Army units, the Chinese Communists found that there was 
a shortage of Negroes in the armed services, and they began 
a hasty program to attract more Negroes into the Army. One 
of these attempts was a poster which was widely distributed 
in Negro business and residential areas, and prominently dis- 
played in Negro taverns and barber shops. The poster read: 


Are you victims of race prejudice? Do white girls refuse to go 
home with you? As a United States soldier, you can travel 
abroad and be stationed in the homelands of our allies, where 
your high pay will make you wealthy in the eyes of the people. 
Your money is worth five times as much as theirs. Negro- 
Americans! The white girls of Germany and England are wait- 
ing eagerly to see your healthy smiles. JOIN THE UNITED 

This plan came to an abrupt halt when copies of the poster 
were sent to Europe, where a press campaign was inaugurated 
to stop the planned debauching of white European girls by 
black soldiers, a favorite goal of the Communists which began 
shortly after World War One, when detachments of black 
Senegalese troops from the French Army were stationed in 
Germany and given orders to rape as many German girls as 

The Federal Government withdrew all copies of the poster 
and destroyed them. A European newspaper offered a thou- 
sand dollars for a copy but none could be found. One tactic 
of the Communists had backfired. 


A prominent characteristic of the Jewish parasite's tech- 



niques of slow paralysis of the higher thinking centers of the 
gentile masses is the continuing efficacy of old methods. The 
Jewish biological drive to destroy gentile civilization through 
the infiltration and control of the nerve centers has been cen- 
tralized in the techniques of fomenting Communist revolutions 
in the industrialized nations. 

In 1848, there were street demonstrations against govern- 
ment policies in many European nations, riots which the police 
could not control. Some European governments fell before 
the Communist onslaught of 1848. Now we find, a century 
later, that the same techniques of street demonstrations work 
just as well, because the demonstrators grow more aggressive, 
and every department of the government is tested and strained 
until it gives way. 

The initial impetus of the riots comes from students who 
are agitated by their instructors. Plans are made, students 
are indoctrinated by faculty members and by older "students". 
In Berkeley, California, the organizers of the student riots 
were found to be "students" in their late twenties or early 
thirties, and many of the protestors were not students at all, 
but persons who had taken up residence near the campus 
for the purpose of fomenting riots. 


The churches in the United States play a vital role in pro- 
viding "sanctuary" for the Communist plotters, raising money 
for the demonstrations, and serving meals to the rioters, who 
are too busy with their work of planned disruption to be con- 
cerned with providing food for themselves. Dedicated Marxist 
organizers, who probe for every weakness in the community 
with all the skill of highly trained surgeons, have long recog- 
nized that the churches and the air of piety provide the ideal 
cover for their revolutionary operations. Infiltrating the church 
groups is no problem, because they are already wracked with 
dissension over theological matters, and the administration 
is composed of college-educated persons who have been 
thoroughly indoctrinated with the proven shabez goi tech- 
niques for controlling the gentile masses. Thus, Communists 
infiltrate the seminaries (Josef Stalin began his revolutionary 



activities as a student priest), and with the aid of other Com- 
munists, they rise to positions of command in all the religious 


Rosemary Reuther, one of the nation's outstanding Catholic 
scholars and a teacher at George Washington University and 
Howard University, exposed the origins of our church offices 
in "The Church Against Itself", Herder and Herder, NY, 1967, 
page 134, 

"The first concept of church office was borrowed, not sur- 
prisingly, from the Jewish synagogue. The sanhedrin, the coun- 
cil of elders which ruled every Jewish community, provided 
the first model for church office. This pattern was established 
first in Jerusalem, where, by Paul's time, it had succeeded in 
replacing the original community of Jesus' followers and sub- 
stituting a presbyterial structure modeled on the Jerusalem 
sanhedrin. " 

Thus we find that the church administration, a short time 
after the Sanhedrin had demanded Christ's crucifixion, kicked 
out Jesus' followers and adopted the dictatorial administration 
of His murderers. This is one of the most amazing discoveries 
ever revealed about the strange role of the churches in deny- 
ing Christ and trying to destroy His followers! Read it again 
and again, until you understand why the churches today em- 
brace every tenet of Communism and reject every principle 
of Christ. 


The most valuable members of the church who promote 
class struggle are those who are not Communists at all, but 
who are disoriented fools who are unable to accept Christ, who 
are dissatisfied with their life, and who wish to provoke 
Armageddon by any means at their disposal. 

What is most surprising is the continued gullibility of the 
students in our universities, who are still enthralled by a Com- 
munist "wave of the future" which is mired in the atmosphere 
of 1848. Marxism plods along with the same dreary set of 



concepts with which it faced the onset of the Industrial 
Revolution. Communism has not come up with a single new 
idea for more than a century, yet it tries to meet the Space 
Age with a theory which was obsolete even when it was first 
set forth by Karl Marx! 


Our students are never informed that the ideological masters 
of Communism, Marx and Lenin, were men who were com- 
pletely out of touch with the life of the societies which pro- 
duced them. They spoke of the "revolt of the peasantry" at a 
time when the peasants were moving to the cities to take 
factory jobs, but then, what could Marx, sitting in a dusty 
room of the British Museum and wriggling back and forth as 
his hemorrhoids tormented him, know of the changing world 
outside of the book stacks, and what could Lenin know of the 
world during the years which he spent quietly reading in a 
Swiss library, leading the life of a retired insurance salesman, 
until the twentieth century caught up with him and dragged 
him back to Russia, where he became the willing tool of a 
homicidal maniac named Lev Bronstein, or Trotsky? Yet 
American professors today present these two intellectual back- 
waters, Marx and Lenin, as the two most original thinkers 
of all time! 


One reason that American students are so prone to embrace 
doctrines of revolt is that they know they are being robbed, 
that they are not getting the education they are paying for, 
because the "treason of the clerks", the trahison des clercs 
which Julien Benda, a French scholar, exposed, prevents them 
from receiving an education. The shabez goi professors, the 
treasonable clerks, cram the outdated philosophies of Marx 
and Freud down the throats of the students when they need 
an education for the Space Age! 


One of the principal reasons for student rebelliousness is 
the ubiquitous MacLeish Syndrome which they encounter in 
our better universities, particularly in the Ivy League schools. 



The MacLeish Syndrome has two firm tenets which are never 
deviated from: "1. All culture must be presented as Jewish in 
origin. 2. All human thought must be attributed to either Marx, 
Freud or Einstein, and must be clearly labelled as originating 
from these Jewish 'geniuses'." Forbidden to know the work 
of such great gentile minds as Ezra Pound, Werner von Heisen- 
berg, and hundreds of others, the students grow restless, and 
after two or three years of this dreary rabbinical education 
strictly on the lines of the Talmud, they are ripe for any doc- 
trine of revolt. Yet, instead of rebelling against their sick pro- 
fessors, they allow the professors to send them out to wreck 
the surviving institutions of their gentile civilization. 

The MacLeish Syndrome is characterized by a tweedy, Scot 
terrier type of individual who has been a lifelong pet of the 
liberal non compos mentis. Because of inherited income, this 
type affects a genial air of native superiority, and entertains 
student leaders in a den lined with the first editions of the 
works of former students, nor is he reluctant to describe how 
he arranged for their publication. 

A good sherry is poured for the students by a subservient 
black man while the MacLeish talks easily about the necessity 
for human equality. Often silly, and always dishonest, the Mac- 
Leish sits regally in a vast easy chair of Spanish leather, puff- 
ing a rare mixture of imported tobaccos in his pipe and wearing 
a red silk smoking jacket from Sulka, while black patent leather 
slippers from Peele of London dangle from his toes. The stu- 
dents literally perch at his feet, while the MacLeish peddles 
a watered-down version of the gospel according to Karl Marx. 

Dazed by the MacLeish syndrome, the students rise up and 
go out into the world to purvey classical Marxism to the masses 
whom this philosophy is intended to enslave. From the posts 
which they obtain, they rise rapidly in the spheres of educa- 
tion, journalism, religion and government, their promotions de- 
pending solely on the degree in which they are effective in 
spreading the Marxist gospel. Whatever doubts the students 
may have entertained about this gospel soon vanish as they 
discover how it opens the doors for them in their chosen pro- 
fessions. Those whose systems reject the infection find that 
twenty years later, they are teaching study hall at the Podunk 



Grammar School, or tending a deserted library in East Go- 
watchee, Pennsylvania. 


What is puzzling is the continued gullibility of the students, 
who blindly accept as "the wave of the future" a philosophy 
of Marx which was already obsolete one hundred years ago. 
How can they be so obtuse? In the first place, a student must 
begin with what he is exposed to, the sunlight and air and 
water which is available to him. Now, if he gets only shabez 
goi thought from his Jewish teachers, what else can he know? 
Cut off from his native Western culture, the American stu- 
dent today is a rootless tumbleweed, driven by the wind 
from one goofy Marxist theory to another, and unaware of his 
heritage, his people and his nation. His anger at finding that 
the education he pays for is an empty sham is understandable, 
but his failure to react against the true culprits suggests that 
his native instincts have been destroyed, as he reacts against 
his society, rather than against the perverters of the education- 
al system themselves. 


The recent Columbia University riots may presage an awak- 
ening on the part of the students, as the eviction of President 
Grayson Kirk from his office would seem to be a sign of stu- 
dent awareness, yet the same dreary Marxist slogans scrawled 
on the walls indicates that they have learned nothing. Those 
students who defecated upon Dr. Kirk's desk may have demon- 
strated a legitimate resentment, but they also revealed their 
own lack of judgment. Instead of attacking the milksop Marx- 
ism of their perverters, they were led by Jewish agitators who 
criticized the professors for not being more Marxist! Is there 
any intelligence left in such students, or have their minds been 
totally destroyed by such Jewish activists as Mark Rudd at 
Columbia University, the son of a Lithuanian Jew named Jacob 
Rudnitsky, and in France, the student leader who wrecked 
the De Gaulle regime, a redheaded Jewish agitator named 
Daniel Cohn-Bendit, also known as "Danny the Red"? 


The plight of the students reflects the unhappy situation 



of the entire gentile masses, a condition of menial serfdom. 
Now, when we say that Americans are being held in mental 
bondage, what do we mean? We mean that every newspaper, 
radio station, television station, magazine and stage and 
screen play has been edited by Jewish agents to remove any 
reference to their crimes and to keep the gentile masses in a 
condition of sleep. This would be a fantastic statement, if we 
did not have at hand the annual reports of the organizations 
which perform this censorship. Foremost is the Anti-Defama- 
tion League of B'nai B'rith, with the American Jewish Com- 
mittee and the American Jewish Congress as other important 
agents of censorship. 

These groups issue annual reports in which they document 
the fact that their agents check every public presentation of 
any kind, written or staged, and delete any references to Jewish 
misdeeds. As a writer, I have followed the A D L operations 
closely for twenty years. If I submit a story to the Saturday 
Evening Post, an ADL staff member, whose salary is paid by 
the magazine, checks the story for any reference to Jewish 
activities, and also checks a blacklist to see if my name is there 
as a critic of the Jews. Even if the story contains no reference 
to the Jews, it is rejected because my name is on the Jewish 
blacklist, and I must be prevented first, from earning any 
money from my writings, and second, from reaching an 

If I submit a manuscript to a publishing house, it is again 
checked first for references to the Jews, and second, to see if 
its author is on the Jewish blacklist. In this manner, the Jews 
prevent any gentile writer from reaching the public if he is 
known to be indifferent or hostile to their goals, if he has re- 
fused to become a member of the shabez goi class. Any pub- 
lication which rejects Jewish censorship is either driven out 
of business, or taken over by Jewish financial interests. A 
book which is published by gentiles who are not of the shabez 
goi class is ignored by the book review departments of mass 
publications, and bookstores refuse to stock it, for their stocks 
are reviewed monthly by traveling ADL agents who enter 
the store incognito, inspect the stock, and if any publication 
is found which mentions the Jews, the proprietor is threaten- 



ed with various weapons, lawsuits, government action, or 
financial revenge. 


Many gentile publications, such as the Literary Digest, 
Liberty Magazine, and others have been driven out of business 
by the ADL, not because they published "anti-Semitic" articles, 
but because they refused to let ADL inspectors control their 
operations. Other magazines, such as Collier's, were pros- 
perous publications, but Jews took over their editorial staffs 
and filled their pages with hysterical invective against anyone 
who opposed them, until the disgusted subscribers quit read- 
ing them. 

The Saturday Evening Post is now traveling this road of no 
return. Once a virile publication which reached a respectable 
percentage of the American middle class, it has become a 
vicious and irresponsible organ of Jewish propaganda, and is 
facing bankruptcy for this one reason. So important has it 
become to the Jews that Martin Ackerman, a Jewish entre- 
preneur, recently rushed in with a five million dollar loan. 
A week later, he announced that he had recouped his loan by 
selling the Saturday Evening Post subscription list to Life Mag- 
azine, a typical wheel-and-deal operation. Nevertheless, the 
Saturday Evening Post is doomed to go the way of Collier's, 
for, under its present editors, it is a sick and vile publication. 
ADL agents fill its pages with their garbage as they try to 
brainwash the American people. Typical was a vicious and 
unprovoked attack against the American businessman, H. L. 
Hunt, in a recent issue of the Saturday Evening Post, written 
by a professional clown named William Buckley. This article 
referred to Mr. Hunt as a "boob with appallingly bad man- 
ners" a "buffoon" and other sneering Jewish epithets. One 
ostensible reason for Buckley's attack may have been Mr. 
Hunt's refusal to contribute to the staggering losses suffered 
by Buckley's venture into publishing, the National Review, 
which was neither national nor a review. 


William Buckley, a well-advertised "conservative spokes- 
man", has been described as a figment of George Sokolsky's 



imagination. A Jewish provocateur, Sokolsky decided to use 
Buckley's money to launch a "rightwing" magazine which 
would peddle approved Jewish techniques of "anti-Commun- 
ism". Sokolsky and a Hollywood gagwriter named Morrie 
Ryskind put together the format of the National Review, 
which it still follows today. Although Sokolsky died, the Na- 
tional Review was condemned to drift forever on the sea of 
his murky ideas, in which only three principles could be dis- 
cerned. The first was that Jews are not Communists, the sec- 
ond was that anti-Semitism was the worst evil of which man 
could be guilty (a plank which Sokolsky borrowed from the 
Soviet Constitution) and the third was that all Americans are 


One of the techniques of A D L control is to keep the gen- 
tiles at each other's throats through tried and proved methods 
of provocateurism. When Robert Welch founded a gentile 
anti-Communist group, the John Birch Society, an ADL pro- 
vocateur persuaded Buckley to attack Welch as being "anti- 
Semitic". Stung by the accusation, Welch hastily hired Jewish 
editors to supervise his publications, but Buckley continued 
his attacks, and the supposed goal of the National Review and 
the John Birch Society, anti-Communism, disappeared in an 
avalanche of mud-slinging, a typical shabez goi imbroglio, 
while the Jews laughed their heads off. The moral is that each 
time you hit a ball across the net, a Jew wins a point, because 
shabez goi conditioning, the Pavlov slavering of the trained 
dogs, occurs on schedule whenever the Jew utters the key 
word, "anti-Semitism". But trained dogs, however amusing 
they may be in a circus, cannot build a nation, nor can they 
administer one which others have built. 


Looking at this situation superficially, as we have been 
trained to do by the Jews, we may well ask, Why shouldn't 
the Jews do all of our thinking for us, censor our books and 
burn anything they do not wish us to read? But this goes 



against the grain of the American legend of freedom and 
self-expression, it denies us the right to examine and solve our 
national problems. America faces a serious economic crisis, a 
serious racial crisis, and a serious military crisis, yet the Jew 
refuses to allow us to discuss these problems, for fear that 
we might criticize the role of the parasite in exploiting the host. 
More important, we are frustrated in our search for wisdom. 
As crucial as the maintenance of life itself is man's quest for 
wisdom, the fruit of a healthy life, in order to bring more 
benefits to his people. Ezra Pound once said to me, "A man 
should study German philosophy from age forty to sixty, 
Greek from age sixty to eighty, and after he has reached the 
age of eighty, he is ready to tackle Chinese philosophy." But 
all we get is Jewish philosophy, from the cradle to the grave. 
Not only is this philosophy devoted to the maintenance of the 
parasite's ascendancy over the host, but it also prevents us 
from knowing Christ. A great republic is collapsing into the 
dust, but what do the Jews care about this? As their slogan 
says, "Who needs it?" They will travel to another host, and 
America will join the ghosts of Babylon, Egypt, Persia, and 


The A D L has a vast arsenal of weapons to use against those 
gentiles who oppose them. I have experienced the following: 
being discharged from professional positions; prevented from 
finding an established publisher for my articles and books; a 
continual propaganda campaign to prevent me from establish- 
ing a following among conservative Americans. 

Although I knew nothing about the A D L when I began 
writing anti-Communist articles and books, I soon came up 
against them. A leading New York publisher told my agent, 

"Mullins made a great mistake in going against us. He is 
versatile and prolific, we could have done a lot for him. Look 
what we did for other gentile writers, Hemingway, Steinbeck, 
Faulkner, they were just high school talents but we made 
them household words in America. Now Mullins will never 
have a dime, because his books will never find an outlet in 
this country." 



When this story was relayed to me, it affected me not at all, 
because at this time, in 1952, I had a growing audience for 
my work, and some influential people in New York began a 
campaign to raise money so that I could devote all of my time 
to anti-Communist writing. My own funds at this time totalled 
a hundred and fifty dollars, on which I could survive, by 
abstemiousness and thrift, another three months. Suddenly 
the fund-raisers ceased their efforts. I began to hear a rumor 
so unbelievable that I ignored it. This story, widely circulated 
among New York patriots, was that I owned large estates in 
Virginia and that the income from these properties enabled me 
to live the life of a gentleman scholar, to travel, and write as 
I pleased. In reality, I have never owned anything but the 
clothes on my back, and have no prospects of inheriting any- 
thing, but the story did its work, and the ADL put an effective 
end to the campaign to back me in my work. 


In 1954, my name disappeared from "anti-Communist" pub- 
lications in America, although some of them continued to ad- 
vertise my Federal Reserve book, with the name of the author 
carefully blacked out! It is still advertised in this fashion 
today. Only one patriot, Mrs. Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, con- 
tinued to give me space in her newspaper, Women's Voice. 
This silent treatment proved the effectiveness of ADL con- 
trol over the supposedly "anti-Communist" newspapers and 
magazines in this country, because I had become, in a few 
years, the leading scholar of this group, with my exposes of 
the Federal Reserve System, the Council on Foreign Rela- 
tions, and other shabez goi operations. FBI agents visited the 
offices of these publications and warned them against printing 
my work or mentioning my name. For nearly fifteen years, I 
worked quietly at home, developing my theories of the bio- 
logical parasite, while most patriots supposed that I was either 
dead or no longer active. 


With the degeneration of all levels of life in America, the 



most pronounced decadence appeared in the children of the 
affluent society, shabez goi families. These children formed a 
disillusioned class which became known as "hippies". 

The Saturday Evening Post interviewed a large group of 
hippies in San Francisco. One gentile youth said, "My father 
is supposed to be a big man in our town, yet I saw that 
he was always raising money for Jewish charities, signing peti- 
tions for Jews, things like that. I asked him, 'What's the idea? 
You don't give a damn for anybody, much less the Jews.' He 
told me that if he refused to do this, he would be wiped out 
in a few days. We live in a fine home, have three cars, a color 
TV, you name it. But I told him, 'It's not worth it,' and I 
walked out." 


This American youth expressed a correct reaction against 
the pernicious influence of the Jewish parasite. Only when 
our youth begins to express its contempt for every member 
of the shabez goi, every educator who trains the youth to 
become gentile slaves, every religious leader who tells his con- 
gregation that it is their duty to work for the Jews, every 
government official who taxes the gentiles for the benefit 
of the Jews, only then can we hope for a "reaction" against 
the parasites. 

It is this "trahison des clercs", the betrayal of the people by 
the educated middle class, which makes the continued hold 
of the parasite possible. Without this active assistance, he 
would be dislodged immediately. Every aspect of gentile exis- 
tence is poisoned by the shabby, vicious and cheap gentiles 
who have become the passive agents of the parasite's power. 
Yet it is they who are held up as models for the nation's 
youth. It is they who are the presidents of our colleges, di- 
rectors of our museums, heads of our publishing houses, chair- 
men of our religious denominations. Only by challenging them 
at every step can the gentile begin the process of dislodging 
the parasites. Since these gentiles already despise themselves, 
they will not be surprised to discover that they are despised 
by the rest of the population, including their Jewish masters. 
The next step is to drive them out of every office, and to re- 



place them with people who have "kindness", that is, who are 
responsive to the needs of their own kind, and who will not 
sell their people for fifty pieces of silver. 


It would be a mistake for the scholar to suppose that the 
entire shabez goi community understands the parasite-host 
relationship, or that our educators, government officials and 
religious leaders are active agents in a conspiracy to enslave 
the gentiles. There are no conspiracies in nature. People lead 
the lives which their genes map out for them, and these laws 
can be evaded only two ways, by following Christ, or by 
following Satan. The parasite automatically seeks to follow 
a parasitic existence, and the shabbiest, most vicious and 
cheapest of the gentiles find their only fulfillment in the life 
of a shabez goi. They miseducate, misgovern and confuse the 
gentile masses because that is the only role they can know in 
life. Without Jewish support, our college presidents would be 
fortunate to find employment as janitors, our government of- 
ficials would qualify only as swineherds. 

In the United States, many of the shabez goi are in the third 
and fourth generations of their shabez goi professions. The 
Adlai Stevenson and Dulles families shuttle back and forth 
between high government positions and posts in Jewish banks 
and law firms. These, so we are told, are the American aris- 
tocrats, who lead the gentile masses in Pavlov gestures of ap- 
proval of each action of the Jews. 


Thus we find the American masses applauding the atrocities 
which the Israelis commit against the Arabs. Yet these Arab 
peoples have always been America's friends and allies. An 
Arab leader asked, "How can Americans applaud the out- 
rages of their worst enemies, the Jews in the bandit state of 
Israel, and cheer them on in their aggressions against us?" 

The answer is that the shabez goi, in their dominant posi- 
tions as publishers, educators, and government officials, have 
trained the American masses in group responses like trained 



dogs. Only when some of our young people rebel against the 
role of trained dog, and refuse to bark when the shabez goi 
order them to, will there be hope for us. Only when we fight 
against the well-dressed rabble which make possible the para- 
site's dominance will we have a chance. Only then can we 
remove the tentacles of the parasite from our body. 

Throughout nature, the parasite seeks a host. The host tries 
to dislodge him. If he succeeds, the parasite soon returns. 
The Jews have been expelled from European nations hundreds 
of times, yet they are there today. Each time the parasite is 
cast out, he learns a lesson, he will improve his hold the next 
time. He learns to anticipate and control the reactions of the 
host, and as he turns their nations into vast, shabby prisons, 
he affects their most fundamental impulses and warps their 
entire existence. 


This is the state of Western civilizations today. Only ma- 
chines have freedom. The gentile masses of the Western de- 
mocracies are already dying. Many of them are zombies, the 
walking dead. What can we say to these walking dead? Do 
they have enough nervous energy left to respond to an appeal 
to cast out their parasites, or has the Jewish poison paralyzed 
their bodies? 

What is the ethic of the parasite-host relationship? Is it im- 
moral? No, it is natural for the parasite to seek a host on which 
it can feed, and it is natural for the host to attempt to dislodge 
him. The Jew is obeying his God when he fulfills his life mis- 
sion of being a parasite, of finding and controlling a host. It is 
the sense of his own historical rightness, as Trotsky formulated 
it in Communism, which led the Jew to believe that he was 
indeed a Chosen People, born to live off the work of others, 
and to take their goods and lands. 


Today, the Jew believes that everything the gentile owns has 
come from the parasite, that the parasite has brought the good 
life to the ignorant gentile cattle, given him a culture, a mone- 



tary system, and a religion. The Jew believes that he has given 
propose and direction to the life of the gentiles, in training the 
gentiles to become his slaves, for the Jew believes that their 
only role in life is to serve him. For this reason, the Jew be- 
lieves that all of history is Jewish history, as the historian Dub- 
now claims. He may be right, insofar as much of recorded 
history is a series of variations upon the host-parasite theme. 

However, Dubnow and all other Jewish historians refuse 
to admit one thing, the damaging influence of the parasite 
upon the host. Yet this has been proven in every instance, 
either by the collapse visited upon the host by the presence 
of the parasite, or by a great renaissance of culture, learning 
and power of the host when it manages to rid itself of the 
parasite, even for a comparatively short time. Look at Eliza- 
bethan England, after the Jews had been expelled. In a few 
short years, the English people had such a flowering as the 
world had never seen, tremendous productions of poetry, 
drama, world exploration and scientific discoveries. Coke gave 
us the Common Law during this period, which became the 
basis for the United States Constitution. 

Look at America before 1860, when the country was largely 
free of the parasite blight, a young nation which was the hope 
of the civilized world. Look at Germany today, where it is a 
crime by law on the statutes to mention the parasite by name, 
and compare it with the Germany of 1800. Germany today is 
a nation of despair, because the parasite has once again fasten- 
ed its tentacles deep into the host, with the aid of foreign 
occupying armies, and poisoned every aspect of German life. 
Yet in 1800, all of Germany was alive, great composers were 
writing the symphonies which we listen to today, and Count 
von Humboldt was amazing the world with his scientific dis- 
coveries, while Goethe was becoming known as the single 
greatest figure in world philosophy. 


Thus, we must admit a fundamental law of nature. If the 
host cannot dislodge the parasite, it sinks into a slow, degener- 
ating trauma of sickness and death. If it can dislodge the 
parasite, it quickly soars to new heights of accomplishment and 



But, if the gentile host is always prey to the guile of the 
parasite, how can he survive? There is but one way, the gentile 
must become serene in the Love of Jesus Christ, he must 
acknowledge that he had been chosen as the instrument of 
Christ's Love which the Jews rejected, and when the gentile 
begins to know himself, and to acknowledge his identity as 
the chosen instrument of Christ's Love for all men, he will 
be armed against every wile, every bit of poison which the 
parasite seeks to inject into him. 

Now, serene in that Love, and knowing yourself, prepare 
yourself for a life of dedication to your people, and work for 
the day when the host will once more be free of the parasite, 
when every member of an aroused community will cooperate 
in driving the despicable shabez goi educators, government of- 
ficials and religious leaders from their positions as tools of the 
parasites. Then we will be able to live in a community of kind- 
ness and love, because we will have rescued our nation from 
the beggars, thieves and jackals who seek to install the Anti- 
Christ as our master. Then we can fulfill our roles in life as 
God meant us to. 




P. J. VAN BENEDEN— Animal Parasites and Messmates (1878). 

F. M. BURNET— Biological Aspects of Infectious Diseases (1940). 

E. BRUMPT— Precis de Parasitologie (1936). 

M. CAULLERY— Le Parasitisme et la Symbiose (1922). 

A. C. CHANDLER — Introduction to Parasitology (1944). 

HEGNER AND HUFF— Parasitology (1916). 

CM. WENYON— Protozoology (1926). 

R. LEUCHART— Parasites of Man (1886) Edinburgh. 

FANTHAM AND THEOBALD — The Animal Parasites of Man (1916). 

J.RENNIE — Parasitic Plants (London, 1926). 

A. RAILLIET — Traite de Zoologie Medicale et Agricole (1885). 

M. BRAUN AND O. SEIFERT— Die Tierischen Parasiten des 
Menschen (Wurzburg, 1903). 

A. C. CHANDLER— On Parasitism and Human Disease (1918). 

W. YORKE AND P. A. MAPLESTONE — The Nematode Parasites of 
Vertebrates (1926). 

Archiv fur Protistenkunde (Jena, 1902) 

Journal of Parasitology, Urbana, 1914. 

Journal of Helminthology, School of Tropical Medicine, 
London University, 1923. 

Annates de parasitologie humaine et comparee, Paris, 1922. 

Parasitic Animals, by GEOFFREY LAPAGE, Cambridge University 
Press, 1951.